Sunday, June 11, 2017

from the Templeton Town Face Book page
Message from Town Administrator Bob Markel
The Department of Revenue has always discouraged the use of free cash to balance the budget. Bond rating agencies do the same, and the low bond rating for the Town reflects, in part, the lavish use of free cash to fund the operating budget. However, this is not illegal; it is simply unsound financial policy.
The amount of free cash available changes yearly, and it is not predictable. Free cash is considered one-time revenue, and the Department of Revenues recommends that it used to augment the Stabilization Fund (reserves) or for one-time purchases like capital items.
Audit firms do not do a thorough job of auditing the books (unfortunately). They come and test various areas of the town’s finances to see if there are problems, but some problems are not caught and can persist for years. They tell you up front that they cannot do a thorough audit for the relatively modest amount they charge. The DOR representative at today’s meeting called the standard municipal audit a “hit and run” audit. Still, some firms are more reputable and more competent than others. I cannot name names in this message, but there are several firms that I would never hire.
Recommendation: The Selectboard should create an Audit Committee of knowledgeable citizens who will have two responsibilities: 1) Bid the audit contract every three years, and hire an independent auditor; and 2) Receive the annual audit and do a public review of the findings and the management letter. Municipal auditors are typically hired by the Town Administrator, Town Accountant or Finance Director. This is an inherent conflict of interest since town officials who do the hiring are the ones whose work is being audited. Hiring and receiving the audit should be an arm’s length transaction from the Town’s financial team.
The Department of Revenue oversees 351 cities and towns in the Commonwealth. They accept data provided by the Town Accountant, the Treasurer/Collector and the Assessors. They often question the data, but they are not always able to verify if data submitted on the Tax Recap or Schedule A are accurate. The DOR does not have access to the town’s accounting system. For example, the DOR was in Templeton today to question whether the Town has properly reported debt obligations on the DE-1 section of Schedule A. Some debt is paid from general revenue within the town budget and some debt is paid through debt exclusion. There is a correct way to report these two types of debt on Schedule A. The DOR representatives checked to see if the Town reported the data correctly, but they are limited in their ability to verify the accuracy of the data.
The long term solution to Templeton’s financial problems is to hire a professional Town Administrator who will put in place a competent financial management team – Accountant, Treasurer, Collector and Assessors. The Selectmen and Advisory Board have the responsibly to oversee the T.A. and the financial team on their management of the Town’s finances. To complement the BoS and Advisory Board, the Audit Committee should retain a reputable accounting firm to conduct an annual audit with the results made public.
Bob Markel
Interim Town Administrator


I believe there should be more of this on the Templeton face Book page and less individual photos, updates and the like. It is one more tool to make available to any and all, valuable public information on things such as budget, board and committee make up and schedules.

my opinion and posted by Jeff Bennett

6 comments:

  1. The Audit Committee should retain a reputable accounting firm to conduct an annual audit with the results made public.

    What happened there folks?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous1:00 PM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous1:01 PM

    This is just a question. Are we sure that there was no stealing of any funds ?

    Look what happened in neighboring towns around us !

    It seems that there always someone stoping and derailing an investigation. Are they covering up for people !!!! makes you wonder !!

    Maybe it is thine for a forensic audit

    Just my opinion

    ReplyDelete
  4. Simply put we appear to need an accounting of the General Stabilization Fund activity. Does it match with what was voted at Town Meeting.
    Who has the supervisory role over that account? Who would be the signatory?


    Mike, the problem is without accurate information and a detailed explanation people will be left to wonder if your thoughts have weight.
    Hopefully it's more poor bookkeeping, math, administration skills than theft. Time will tell as I cannot see this slipping by..............squirrel!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. To start with like many things and accounts in Templeton did it exist to begin with.
    When did the stop gap accountant Saywer have a accurate balance in the general fund?
    Votes or not did we ever have the 162k or was it just a number the certified accountant was given and now with the audit results we find it a little short.

    Think for a minute ,WHY should that amount be correct?
    What else is in Templeton?
    I'd be looking for the 50k the check book balance is off.
    Balance way off and now we need a treasurer,AGAIN?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes, that is a point Dave. I just looked at the DLS site for Templeton 2016 Rev vs expenditures. The report show Templeton reported $633,408.00 more in Revenues than Expenditures. I do agree it does appear difficult to trust many of the numbers without much more detailed information.

    Someone mentioned Winchendons bond rating the other day. On the DLS site databank comparing Templeton to Winchendon shows one very important difference that concerns me.
    In every year reported Templeton had more revenues reported than expenditures. In many years it was a significant amount. Winchendon actually shows Expenditures out pacing Revenues in 2014. I need to find out more information regarding this issue. There is a reall good possibility the numbers reported aren't worth the lack of paper they weren't printed on......lol

    ReplyDelete