Saturday, January 28, 2017

An interesting comment from this blog:


Surprise Surprise Surprise, Seems quite odd that Chartier has been doing continuous restoration and repairs on town hall without going out to bid, right now they have the go ahead to install air conditioning in the building according to an employee at town hall. always wondered where all that money was coming from and why they automatically get every job.

I think the bigger concern should be if Mr. Chartier is on the planning Board and there is a Christoff Chartier listed as an elected member of the Templeton Planning Board. So, does that raise an issue? Does it have the appearance of an elected official using their position for personal gain? Is that work going their way because they are in that position or because they are in Town Hall often? Has the work been bid? Has the contracts been broken down so as to be below the threshold of having to go to bid, so as to only use good business practices and get three quotes? Is this the item the auditors have found and raised concerns about? Is this something that needs to be reported to the Inspector General's office? You bet it is and it will be reported by me! If it has improper appearance, avoid it. Perhaps Mr. Chartier did nothing wrong but it looks suspicious, so in my opinion, it should not have been done. Templeton does need these clouds now or in the future, Templeton needs sunshine, open curtains and transparency. Templeton needs residents to be involved and Templeton needs people to speak up. This is not really a new situation, as almost every small town has the "good ole boy network" there is always a few who seem to be involved in Town stuff and appear to be trying to help out, but in almost every case, if you look close and be honest, they usually end up benefiting themselves personally and that is not good, just or what this Town needs, especially at this time. This is another issue that I will send to the director of accounts on the DOR.




posted by Jeff Bennett


FY2017 Single-Family Residential Tax Bill
Andrew Nelson, Supervisor, Bureau of Accounts (BOA)
Tony Rassias, Deputy Director, BOA
The State Total single-family residential tax bill for FY2017 is $5,621, an increase of $202 or 3.7 percent from FY2016, according to data captured from 332 of the Commonwealth's 351 cities and towns in the DLS Muncipal Databank.
In addition, the average value of a single-family residential home was $399,413, the highest value since the FY2008 average value of $403,705, which was set as values were starting to drop in the real estate market.
So far in FY2017, with 345 communities reporting valuation data to the Division of Local Services (DLS), single-family residential parcels statewide represent:
Remember, a reduction is the tax rate does not always equal a lower tax bill: if your home goes up in value, such as when a new school is built, your home may increase in value but your tax bill can also increase. This amount would be added to any increase resulting from a debt exclusion vote, so you get a double increase. Nice!


posted by Jeff Bennett
Did Templeton selectmen follow the law?




Q5: We would like to hire an executive search firm to aid us in our search for candidates for a number of executive level positions in our town, including a Town Administrator and new Superintendent of our public schools; is this service exempt from Chapter 30B?

A5: No. An agreement by a city or town with an executive search firm is not exempt from Chapter 30B. Section (1)(b)(22) of Chapter 30B exempts certain service contracts related to employment, including “jobrelated training, educational or career development services,” but these services apply only to the “employees of a governmental body.” This exemption does not include services related to recruiting prospective employees. Therefore, you must secure executive search firm or recruiting services in accordance with the competitive procurement procedures, based on the estimated value of the contract, outlined in Chapter 30B.


Chapter 30B hotline is (617)722-8838

posted by Jeff Bennett
Question: Would you consider it a raise if you were told to work fewer hours but get paid the same as you did while working 40 hours? It appears that is what has happened at Town Hall. Here I thought selectmen were making moves to save money, not give raises.

posted by Jeff Bennett