Thursday, March 28, 2019

With respect to this request which triggered this discussion, you may consider it withdrawn.  We will go back to ground zero and balcony the risks of unperformed tasks and closure at this time versus the risks of unperformed tasks and closure post ATM if we are not able to get a backfill at that meeting.  We will advise all on 04/03 of our course of action.
With respect to future requests, my memo laid out a discussion of the wide and varying views that different Towns take of how to view requests for transfers.  In fact the DOR guidance specifically stated that “Finance committees should adopt their own guidelines to supplement the state statute and provide other town officials with a better understanding of the circumstances under which the committee is likely to use the reserve fund.”  I would urge the AC to develop just such a policy as I firmly believe a better understanding of the full rules of the would be helpful to all.

Finally, I can assure you that this request was not the result of poor budget planning or “… an end around Town Meeting for poor budgeting… “.  On behalf of the Town Staff, let me assure you that your Town staff does not take unscheduled medical leave mid-year without ample justification and does so reluctantly preferring to be on their job serving the community.

Many Thanks

Carter Terenzini
Town Administrator

Note to Mr. Terenzini:

Templeton Reserve fund policy sent to you and all department heads back in 2016!

in part, the policy reads:

Policy on Reserve Fund Transfers
Purpose: The purpose of this policy statement is to identify the criteria the Advisory Committee will use to rule on requests for transfers from the Emergency Reserve Fund. The creation and use of the Reserve Fund is governed by Chapter 40, Section 6 of the Massachusetts General Laws.
The Reserve Fund is a sum of money appropriated at Town Meeting to be used at the discretion of the Advisory Committee to cover “extraordinary or unforeseen expenditures” that arise during the year. This means that if the Advisory Committee does not feel that a request is sufficiently unforeseen or extraordinary as defined below, it is not eligible for a Reserve Fund transfer.
Extraordinary: A) Beyond what is usual, ordinary, regular, or established; a cost not arising from normal activities in the course of business. B) Exceptional in character, amount, extent, degree, etc.; noteworthy, remarkable
Unforeseen: unexpected, unanticipated; not able to be predicted at the time the budget was set.
Policy:
• The Advisory Committee requests that it be alerted when a board or department believes that a developing situation may necessitate a Reserve Fund transfer, especially for large amounts. This will help the Advisory Committee to forecast overall needs, ensure funds are available for the most critical needs, and advise boards and departments in advance whether the Reserve Funds may or may not be available.
• A representative of the requesting organization should plan to be present at the meeting to defend and explain the request. This will ensure that questions from the Advisory Committee can be answered and prevent a denial or delay of approval. If being present is a hardship, please contact a member of the Advisory Committee to try and answer any questions in advance.


Perhaps a monthly review of the Town's expenditure report at a meeting of the board of selectmen could result in such notice, where all things could be considered, including whether a transfer request could wait until May 1, where an end of year transfer could be used rather than a reserve fund request. Either way, how does someone who is charged with oversight of the day to day operations of the Town not be aware of such a policy? With the "building" of the new town website, such policy will be posted under the Advisory Committee.
Is this good management of taxpayer dollars?
Templeton selectmen propose to use ambulance receipts to fund general fund budget, while they propose to lease an ambulance to include estimated $32,000.00 in interest. Under the capital plan, ambulance purchase price quoted is $297,000.00, so fire chief asks for $300,000.00 while the T/A suggests $315,000.00. Draft warrant proposes 5 year lease at $56,000.00 for five years = $280,000.00 and also asks for additional $70,000 so as to keep purchase lease amount as presented. Added together, that is $350,000.00, so when asked why so much extra money for ambulance, borrowing costs / interest of $32,000.00. So, February expenditure report shows $250,000.00 in ambulance receipts, now if $50,000.00 from free cash was added to that 250K, ambulance purchased outright, town does not spend $32,000.00 on borrowing costs and that $32,000.00 is $10,000.00 less than the capital plan dollar figure of $42,000.00 for a new suv police cruiser. The extra 10K needed is right there from the proposed $70,000.00 in draft warrant article #33. Ambulance bought out right, new police cruiser with $10,000.00 left over.
I can hear the selectmen response; "we need that ambulance receipts money to balance the general fund budget"
I look at the fiscal year 2018 end of year report and see $595,784.17 left over from expenses. That money rolls over to so called certified free cash, so perhaps there is a little padding going on regarding expense appropriations? If the same happens in fiscal year 2019, then total expense appropriations require a hard look as that is simply too much left over from expenses that are sold as very tight.

jeff bennett
Wed 3/27/2019 8:00 PM
Caplis, John;
Morrison, Doug;
Diane Haleybrooks;
Richard, Julie
So, did the town buy a dump body for a 1984 Mack ten wheeler? How and why did town accountant approve the spending of a specific tow meeting appropriation on something else?

According to the T/A, the dump body was not purchased!


From: Carter Terenzini <townadministrator@templeton1.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2018 5:15 PM
To: 'jeff bennett'
Cc: dpwdirector@templeton1.org
Subject: RE: dump body
 
Good Day Jeff:

No, the Town did not buy a new dump body for a 1984 Mack it did, however, buy a Dump Body (as we advised people we would with those monies in seeking approval of the $160k for the 6 wheeler).

As to improving Town Meeting and attendance I would suggest you watch the December Talk of the Town and ask you to encourage people to attend the 01/29 public meeting with the Town Moderator and Town Clerk at 6:30 p.m. in the Conference Room.

Many Thanks

Carter Terenzini
Town Administrator
Town of Templeton
160 Patriots Road
East Templeton, MA 01438
1.978.894.2755

From: jeff bennett <j_bennett506@hotmail.com> 
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 4:06 PM
To: Carter Terenzini <townadministrator@templeton1.org>
Subject: Re: dump body

So, my real question is did Templeton buy a new dump body for the 10 wheeler truck mentioned in the town meeting warrant? 
Secondly, the town meeting warrant makes no mention of using this appropriation for anything else other than what was asked for.
Which is why, the town needs to have the actual town meeting warrant at town meeting. We will not get more people to attend town meeting doing business that way.
Thank you for the response.
Bennett
eff bennett
Thu 3/28/2019 7:42 AM
Caplis, John;
Richard, Julie;
Diane Haleybrooks;
Morrison, Doug
The request I made and the results I received. So, how am I to receive a report from a Veterans advisory board that does not exist? How would a report be generated from a board that has not posted an agenda since April 2018? Yet, I receive word from the office of the Board of Selectmen that I will receive such a report. I have to wonder if all selectmen are aware of what goes on in the Board of Selectmen's name that is incorrect?

regards;
Bennett


From: Terenzini, Carter <cterenzini@TempletonMA.gov>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 10:28 AM
To: jeff bennett
Subject: RE: public records request
 
As of this date I do not have a report from the Veteran’s Advisory Board.  My understanding is that they did not have a quorum for the evening they were to finalize it this past week.  I shall forward it upon its receipt.

We do not have on file a copy of the agreement between the TMLWP and NRSD.

Many Thanks

Carter
1.978.894.2755 (o)
1.603.498.0958 (m)

Please note our new email of; and redirect your contacts to - cterenzini@templetonma.gov


From: jeff bennett <j_bennett506@hotmail.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 4:23 PM
To: Young, Holly <hyoung@TempletonMA.gov>; Terenzini, Carter <cterenzini@TempletonMA.gov>; Caplis, John <jcaplis@TempletonMA.gov>
Subject: public records request

Wednesday, February 20, 2019
Holly Young
Town of Templeton
Town Hall, 160 Patriots Road
Templeton, MA 01438
Re: Massachusetts Public Records Request

Holly Young:
This is a request under the Massachusetts Public Records Law (M. G. L. Chapter 66, Section 10). I am requesting that I be provided a copy of the following records:
A report of the Veterans Advisory Board, per Templeton Town general by-law - article LVI: Veterans Advisory Board. According to the by-law, a report from this board is to be provided to the Board of Selectmen in December of each year.
A copy of a contract between Town of Templeton and Narragansett Regional School District involving a wind turbine. Per Massachusetts General Law, chapter 164, section 56C, Every municipal light commission or manager thereof, who makes or executes a contract on behalf of a municipal lighting plant, where the amount involved is five thousand dollars or more, shall furnish said contract or a copy thereof to the city or town auditor within one week after its execution.
I would request, if possible, that these records be provided in electronic form.
I recognize that you may charge reasonable costs for copies, as well as for personnel time needed to comply with this request.
The Public Records Law requires you to provide me with a written response within 10 business days. If you cannot comply with my request, you are statutorily required to provide an explanation in writing.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey Bennett
77 Partridgeville Road, Templeton MA 01468
Northfield, MA resident gets creative; submits article for Town Meeting to limit municipal spending. There was/is a legal problem with the wording but it is a nice idea for residents to become involved in municipal spending. The legal issue was imposing a limit on the bottom line. Good effort on the part of the Northfield taxpayers association.