Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Quiet over here - probably because it is that time of year to be getting things ready for winter.
I actually do other things besides watch and read politics, town business and the selectmen.

Watching a meeting of the Gardner City Council recently, I saw discussion where the Collins institute was brought up. Seems like that organization may not be the final/only solution after all. As one city councilor put it, "it is our job, the council and not the Collins Institute to do this."  Imagine a government entity carrying out it's responsibility or job? Since 2014, this current board of selectmen have failed to hire a full-time Town Administrator.

Perhaps this current Board of Selectmen should be less concerned with what is written here and get focused more on that task. Especially with the current interim Town Administrator looking for work in other places.

So, back a couple of weeks, there about, a strange email (in my opinion) came to light. Templeton interim Town Administrator asked a member of the Templeton Advisory Committee if they would like to serve on a search committee:

From: townadministrator [mailto:townadministrator@templeton1.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 2:45 PM
To: Julie Farrell 
Cc: 'Kelli Pontbriand'
Subject: Treasurer/Collector

Good Day:

Although the By-Law amendment providing for AC members to sit on ad hoc screening committees has not yet come back formally approved by the AG’s Office,  I am confident enough that there will not be any problem with it that I would like to invite you to participate as a member of the Team to interview candidates for the position of Treasurer/Collector.

These are tentatively set for the afternoon of 06/21 or 06/22.  

Please let me know at your first convenience that I might loop you in on the process.

Many Thanks

Carter Terenzini
Interim Town Administrator
Town of Templeton



Now, I would ask you, if you were/are just a private citizen serving on no Town committees and having absolutely nothing to do with Town government, would you find it strange that a Town Administrator would ask you the above question while citing a town by-law concerning the Advisory Committee. Now set the box and look at the same question as if you do serve on the Advisory Committee. Would you think this is proper procedure and do you think this is entrapment or a strange question?

So, having been asked that question, you answer like this:

to townadministra., Kelli, MA, Selectman, Diane, Cameron, Doug, Julie 

Good evening:

Sorry for the delay in my response to your request to serve on the ad hoc screening committee to secure a treasurer collector.

I believe the proper procedure to have a member of the Advisory Committee serve on an ad hoc committee would be to go through the chairman of the Advisory Committee. Then this discussion could take place at an Advisory Committee meeting.

I thought this message had been sent to the Advisory Committee but looking back at the email thread, I realize that is incorrect.

It would be inappropriate for me to serve on any ad hoc committee as an Advisory Committee member without the knowledge, consent and vote of the Advisory Committee.

Best
,,

Citizen

The response you get back: (priceless)

townadministrator 
12:51 PM (16 hours ago)

to me, Kelli, MA, Selectman, Diane, Cameron, Doug, Julie
 
Good Day:

Thanks for your follow-up but I had been asking you as an individual.  Had I been asking you to represent the AC; you are correct and I would have approached the Chair of the AC to have him (or the AC) designate someone to serve.

Many Thanks


Carter Terenzini
Interim Town Administrator

The above email thread would / could make for interesting subject for a government, political science or public administration class for some interesting discussion. Except, it is an actual email to a sitting Advisory Committee member and a very clear case of attempt (in my opinion and my thoughts) at entrapment, to make a member or entire committee look bad. Even an attempt (in my opinion and thoughts) at negating the effectiveness of the Advisory Committee.

This is why I think rather than the selectmen taking time at their last open public meeting, to talk about a post I made here, they should be looking within to ensure this kind of foolishness and serious (in my opinion and thoughts) does not happens again or continue. But, I suppose when an entity can not even follow their own basic rules, we cannot expect much from them. I hope the DLA takes a moment to think about that when they receive the above email as an example of how things go in the selectmen office and in my opinion, why Templeton's finance may not improve in the near future. They can not hire a full time Town Administrator in three years and counting. They cannot follow their own guidelines for meetings, so how can or how should the division of local services expect the selectmen to improve town finance?

posted by Jeff Bennett


15 comments:

  1. I wonder why we only have the Administrative Asst. job listed under job openings on our website.

    No Town Administrator
    No Treasurer Collector

    On the MMA.org site we have the Administrative Asst and Treasurer Collector position open, not Town Administrator position listed.

    It appears we've limited our search for these positions for some reason.

    I bet it was nice to hear the Gardner Council take responsibility and not put it on others or blame a blog posting.


    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous4:16 PM

    With filling an important position like Treasurer/Collector why isn't someone from the BOS and the TA sitting in on the interviews?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous8:36 PM

    please watch the last selectmen's meeting on youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxzNgSEtlUg
    almost 30 minutes wasted discussing blogs and possible open meeting violations and name calling but only a few minutes spent on discussing not hiring the last TA candidate. No time spend discussing the real problems of Templeton. Who cares what is posted on the blogs why don't you selectmen concentrate on Templeton's real problems like finding a TA and a good Treasurer/Collector and getting us out of this financial mess!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well put from someone nobody knows!
    Who cares what is posted on the blogs.
    It's not so much as what is posted it is more of who did and what committee they represent when they hold private non posted meetings in violation of the rules and regulations ,some call them procedures and laws. So i thank the selectman for their hard work to keep the procedures and whatnot in check. It must be a never ending task to keep tabs on all the towns volunteers and their actions.
    All while pulling the knife out of their own backs.
    There will be a awakening however the people may think the sleepers are not going to wake up.
    Anon you missed a cap. Bob may get upset with you.
    Is the water getting any hotter Bob after your meeting tonight.
    Follow the directions and stay out of trouble.
    I think i found out why your so against the cops Bob.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous9:23 PM

    David Smart, you have once again proved why your so hated in town, more spewing of kiss ass, non relevant, jibberish. I and others are wondering what your payoff was to turn so suddenly on issues you fully supported not so long ago. The best thing you could do is SHUSH UP.

    ReplyDelete
  6. How many violations can be filed based on that BOS meeting?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Eatch your mouth kids could be reading and learning how to hide and take pot shots at the people who have saved them money. You forget i saved all TMLP ratepayers 12.00 per year when i pointed out the customer charges were never there prior to the 1st time in 2009.
    But go ahead buy 2 more packs of smokes and enjoy.
    At least my big mouth is worth something you nameless drone.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:30 AM

      Don't pat yourself on the back too much, $12.00 over a year. wow, I guess I should buy a donut with my coffee

      Delete
  8. Anonymous7:04 AM

    Dave your Uncle Paulie would be disgusted with your ass kissing the Board of Selectmen. Has Selectman Caplis promised you Alan's job when they decide to boot him out?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous10:49 AM

    As a town employee Dave has no clue as how town government works and what each committee or board does or doesn't do. Dave what does the town moderator do beside preside at town meetings?

    ReplyDelete
  10. What would you care nameless is pointless.
    I answer questions from people not anondrones.
    Fly back in the closet and hide.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous4:20 PM

    Dave you are one angry Dude. I think the person asked very nicely and all they get is a nasty response

    ReplyDelete
  12. It's easy for the A team to expect but your unable for a open door discussion.
    I would say that the result of the 12$ is what you can call a result.
    Any Anonymous who can dispute that has a problem with their thought process.
    What would you care nameless is pointless.
    I answer questions from people not anondrones.
    Fly back in the closet and hide.
    Anon opinions are a weak way to project a lack of self confidence.
    Pauly could work with BOS and for you to imply he couldn't work with selectman he never had met is low even for a opinion drone. I would bet he would have liked the chairman and could have offered advise and insight not what the issues that are around anon posts like these.
    Time will tell and if you could do your dirty work on the real Blog for Templeton like you do here i would have fun just doing it with out any comments at all.
    I want to thank the Board and the COMMITTEE members who have brought the story out for the plug these Templeton Bolgs got in the TGN today.
    But most won't read it and have better things to do like read how the other towns are looking for higher taxes like we are going to do next year with the advise from the AC when they find the new members who will play a bit nicer.
    Pauly would be ashamed to have a anon post any comments about what he would have wanted. Stick to your own identity and your lack of any moral ground.
    With no name comes less credibility if there is less than 0.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous6:29 PM

    Yep Dave, your delusional.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonyopinionus?
    Next!

    ReplyDelete