Saturday, August 31, 2019

from the NRSD website:
“The Narragansett Regional School District in partnership with the communities and parents, Think about that for a moment.
"In partnership with communities and parents"
I think their partners just told them to do something, accept $19.5 million dollars as a budget base. Apparently that partnership is a one way street. Not only did the school committee just ignore their partners, they belittled them, chastised them and talked them as if they were little kids who do not know what is best or right. I mean, those partners only pay their bills.
As has been pointed out here before, using the dollars provided from DESE or Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, and some dollar figures provided by the district, along with what two towns have said they will provide, added up, those dollars equal $19.8 million dollars.
Message to the school district - Take the $19.5 million before you really piss off your partners. Watch the you tube meeting of the last school committee meeting and you can view how they acted. Personally, I look forward to speaking to the district at the next district wide meeting, as opposed to being quiet at the last one. I hope they bring their car seats.
School committee wants to sit at a table and belittle Templeton residents; who paid for that brand new school, who provides the school resource officer, who is providing the fields that apparently the district is using for sports activities, where does the district office sit. The answer to all of those points is Templeton! So school committee, you may want to stop belittling Templeton by telling us we do not support the schools, we do not pay our fair share or someone pays more than we do.
I see in your spread sheet budget from first meeting in February, a dollar figure of $56,113.00 for practice bus to Gilman, as in Gilman Waite fields (you know, that long project to develop a recreation area for Templeton.
Lastly, I hope the district makes plans for many snow days because if Templeton has to make cuts, the roads may not be plowed in time for it to be safe to have school buses on the roads. Lastly, how about them wood chips, are they still at $28.00 per ton? Were they ever at $28.00 per ton?
The pile of dollars is only so big and there are more things to cover than there are dollars; hence, everyone has to feel the heat, even teachers and kids, it is called reality. Speaking of reality, if you live on Wellington or lower South Road, welcome to reality come the first day of school.

Thursday, August 29, 2019

Something going on??

from the Town Administrator weekly report of August 29, 2019::

Town Clerk: – I spent a lot of time this week responding to a summons for documents from the State Ethics office. I attended the department head meeting. Continue to be busy with marriage certificates and vital records request. Posted the Attorney General’s decision on the general bylaw changes from the Annual Town Meeting.

Sunday, August 25, 2019

In case you need some reading material, here is the Bump report, a study and conclusion by Massachusetts state auditor Suzanne Bump.

https://www.mass.gov/files/documents/2017/10/18/RegionalSchoolDistrictsMunicipalImpactStudy_1.pdf


A few of the things found in the report:

To address some of the challenges highlighted by the study, Bump has called on the Commonwealth to modernize its funding structure for regional schools by:
  • Developing deeper incentives to encourage communities to regionalize, noting that the current incentives do not provide enough enticement for schools to give up some measure of local control;
  • Fully funding its commitment to reimburse 100 percent of regional transportation expenses, offer stipends to encourage efficiencies to reduce transportation costs, and allow the use of regional transportation authorities to provide RSD transportation;
  • Offering planning grants to explore the combination of existing RSDs into larger groupings; and
  • Ensuring greater transparency from the Massachusetts School Building Authority on its decision-making process for districts that close school facilities.
Additionally, in the study, Bump calls on the Legislature to streamline the budget adoption process for RSDs and to examine and revise inconsistent funding formulas for children whose families choose educational options outside of their home community. Bump also called for RSDs to conduct periodic reviews of their regional agreements.
The Templeton Common Master Plan link.

https://www.templetonma.gov/sites/templetonma/files/file/file/final_report_1_22_10.pdf 


enjoy the read and trip down memory lane.

Thursday, August 22, 2019

A letter to the editor; could this be Templeton in the future?

something to think about if you think bringing in all this business will solve everything.

What’s wrong with this picture?
Athol is booming — shopping centers galore — Orange is the made for TV movie capital of the state. Lots of hard cash is flowing into our towns. Marijuana growers and sellers have taken over Main Street with mega proposals for business ventures and job offers.
Our local economy is in the clouds or one would think it should be. Yet upon a closer look we see a very different picture. We see drugs claiming too many of our local young lives. Neighbors who have worked hard all their lives having to sell their beloved homes because of this town’s insatiable appetite for higher and higher taxes that most folks, especially our elderly on fixed incomes, can’t afford to pay. It’s disgraceful to say the least. It makes me wonder, with so much development in the area shouldn’t the residential taxes go down as “Big Business” pays its share of town expenses?
Jim McGovern and Anne Gobi are you asleep at the wheel? Our own Suzie Whipps needs to take a real close look at why all this “progress” and “boom” isn’t trickling down to the “little guy” in the form of property tax relief.
The lifelong residents, especially the elderly, need lower taxes, more services and answers and transparency about how these huge projects and corporations, hotels, et all are going to benefit us townspeople.
We still have no clue as to why we lost our over-qualified FBI-man police chief. A really fine man by all accounts.
Why are our schools so interested in political correctness? They are forgetting school is for reading, writing and arithmetic.
Parents aren’t allowed to question our superintendent? Give me a break. What’s going on here?
We built a multi-million dollar new school building, but it’s like putting lipstick on a pig if the curriculum is still garbage and can’t seem to compete with what’s taught at Bement School or Deerfield Academy, the top private schools. It’s all an effort in futility.
Wake up citizens of Athol and Orange and find out exactly when we can expect some tangible benefit from all this commerce.
We need a local task force made up of locals to protect homeowners so our area won’t remain the foreclosure capital of the state!
I’m sure I’m not the only one saddened by what I see all over our towns.
We need to do something now!
Molly Bennett Aitken
Athol

Tuesday, August 13, 2019

All regional school districts can now be listed in the same category as municipal / state governments - financially questionable. Why would I post that you ask / ponder.
And if you share or copy, please include the details;
June 4, 2019, Narragansett FY2020 "budget" spread sheet shows Templeton minimum contribution at $4,618,384.00, while the department of education (DESE) shows it to be $4,621,299.00 for FY2020. The DESE information comes from the web page of MA department of education (DESE) and this same web page shows chapter 70 state aid at $9,951,444.00 while the above referenced spread sheet from NRSD shows FY2020 chapter 70 money at $9,938,544.00. Please keep in mind, the dollar figures from NRSD were put together BEFORE the final state budget was signed with no veto's, by the governor.
Also note, state aid is based off of information provided by the district on October 1 of the previous year. In this case, October 1, 2018, which in calendar time is less than one year ago. In financial terms, it appears to be two years behind, hence you might have heard (more than once) school superintendent state, the information is two years behind. Fiscally speaking, I suppose one could make that argument, however, I am a simple lil' ole guy, so to me, it is less than a year old. That is just how my rusty old rolladex works.
In short, if anyone expects something other than a no vote at the district meeting, I need to see a detailed and up to date, breakdown of town spending on schools.

Saturday, August 10, 2019

As school districts around Massachusetts struggle to balance their budgets, lawmakers are considering changing the state’s formula for funding schools. Gov. Charlie Baker, the Senate and the House have taken different approaches to fixing it. Their bills will get a hearing March 22.
Here are some of the questions lawmakers will grapple with as they weigh the different bills:
How does the state make the formula more equitable? How does it bring it in line with the current costs of education? How does the state pay for the skyrocketing costs of health insurance for teachers? And the rising costs of educating students in special education? How much more money does it cost to provide an adequate education for poor children and students who aren’t fluent in English? How much should the state subsidize schools in wealthy and medium-income communities? How much more money should the state be paying for education?
To understand what will happen next, it’s important to understand what’s happening now.
Here’s our primer on how the state pays for education.
Like many other states, Massachusetts dictates how much each community should spend on schools.
“Education is the only area where the state tells cities and towns how much to spend on a local function,” Jeff Wulfson, deputy commissioner for the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education said. “We don’t tell cities and towns how much to spend on a local fire department or on their public works department.”
That is in part because of the state’s constitution, ratified in 1780.
"[I]t shall be the duty of legislatures and magistrates, in all future periods of this commonwealth, to cherish … the public schools and grammar schools in the towns," the framers wrote.
Two centuries later, parents of schoolchildren in Brockton said the state wasn’t living up to its constitutional obligation. Specifically, they argued the state’s school financing system violated the constitution.
In June 1993, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decided in McDuffy vs. the Secretary of the Executive Office of Education that the state had a duty to provide an education for all students, no matter where they lived. The court left it to lawmakers and the governor to come up with a new funding system.
Later that same month, the governor signed into law the Education Reform Act, which would increase state aid for schools and included a new formula for funding them.
To devise the formula, superintendents and policymakers added up the cost of all the things they thought went into educating kids. That included class size goals of 22 students for elementary school and 25 students for middle school, as well as the cost of teachers’ salaries and benefits, administration, maintenance, teacher professional development, and books. They called it the “Foundation Budget.”
“The importance of the foundation at the time was that it acknowledged there was a minimum amount of money per pupil amount that every community needed to provide for a basic education,” Tom Scott, the executive director of the Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents, said. “That’s why it’s called the foundation budget. It’s the foundation. It’s the minimal amount.”
The average minimum amount now for a student is $11,448 per year. That formula adds additional aid for districts with high percentages of students who are poor or in special education.
Who pays for that? Part of it comes from taxpayers across the state.
“There is no school district in the Commonwealth whose city or town is paying for the full cost of those schools,” Wulfson said. “The state subsidizes the educational costs of every school district in the state. What varies is the amount that we subsidize it.”
To determine how much a community can afford to pay for schools, the state looks at the income of people living there and property values. For communities with a lot of wealth, the state pays up to 17.5 percent of its basic costs per student. In some poorer cities, the state is paying around 90 percent of those costs.
Even though the state sets a minimum cost for educating kids and helps all districts pay for that, it doesn’t set a maximum. For many districts, $11,448 per student isn’t enough. Some spend more than twice that.
“Certainly many districts voluntarily choose to spend more than that from their local resources,” Wulfson said. “That is one of the proof-points that probably the foundation budget does need to be adjusted when so many people feel it’s inadequate.”

Friday, August 9, 2019

Okay, when we get to the joint district meeting and the amount comes up, which currently stands at $19,786,889.00, we need to see the breakdown of the expenses; the amount from state aid, the two towns assessments. Why is that important you ask?
Phillipston annual town meeting of May 8, 2019.
Town voted $1,657,099.00 (article 11)
Templeton voted at special town meeting of July 18, 2019
Town voted $6,491,070.00 (article 1)
So, we have $6,491,070.00 + $1,657,099.00 = $8,148,169.00.
Then take numbers (estimates) from DESE or DLS web page:
All budgets are estimates; schools, Towns, states, feds.
Total state aid = $10,861,995.00.
So, $10,861,995.00 + E&D $500,000.00 + Medicaid $300,000.00 = $11,661,995.00.
$11,661,995.00 + $8,148,169.00 = $19,810,164.00, so, using Templeton voted number and Phillipston number along with state estimates, the school district will already be getting more money than they asked for. What is the problem? My calculator off? Their calculator off? The above numbers still leave the school with $135,000.00 in E&D funds too.
Please go check it out and see for yourself - before any district wide meeting, or at the very least, at the meeting, we all need to see these numbers and if we do not or are told we cannot see them or any other line of bull, I will vote no.

Tuesday, August 6, 2019

What happened to that school for 350 kids?


Considering all the ups and downs that Templeton has endured as part of its ongoing saga to build a new elementary school, it’s amazing that the Massachusetts School Building Authority has held firm this long in its willingness to reimburse the school’s construction at a rate of 60 percent.
Considering all the ups and downs that Templeton has endured as part of its ongoing saga to build a new elementary school, it’s amazing that the Massachusetts School Building Authority has held firm this long in its willingness to reimburse the school’s construction at a rate of 60 percent.
Board of Selectman Chairman Chris Stewart put the length of the effort into context: “They began talking about this elementary school when my kids were in elementary school, and they are graduating next year.”
For four of those years, Dr. Roseli Weiss carried the “new school” baton as the Narragansett superintendent, having taken it from Dr. Stephen Hemman, who had initially seemed to achieve some progress on that front before he retired in 2008. With Dr. Weiss having recently moved on to Middleborough as that district’s superintendent, Ruth Miller this month took the helm, seeking to eventually get a shovel into the ground to begin building a new facility for the town’s students.
The project has encountered many obstacles, with several sites eyed for the school having not panned out. Now, the current site of Templeton Center Elementary School has become the focus, and has been described by project backers as a last hope to keep the building authority’s support — and its current reimbursement rate.
Obtaining needed support to pursue the Templeton Center site, however, is proving to be a challenge.
“My hope is that the selectmen will all sign this (letter) and allow for it to go forward, as the rest of this (process to begin building) is many votes down the road,” noted Selectman Virginia Wilder.
Miller has ramped up the urgency level regarding the project in recent weeks, pointing to Monday’s meeting of the selectmen — at which discussion of the issue, and of the needed letter of support from the board, is set to take place — as the point at which the town must proceed or “absolutely lose the project.”
To Stewart, though, this recent push to consider the Templeton Center site could easily be explained.
“The changing of the guard of the school committee and the superintendent has changed their perspective of the sites,” said Stewart. “Dr. Weiss didn’t want to go to Templeton Center, with it probably not the best place to put it, but now they realize that’s pretty much all they have. ”
Even if that’s the case, Stewart is still banking on the MSBA to provide town and school officials with some degree of flexibility.
“The MSBA is kind of getting fed up with us changing our minds,” he said. “Even so, it might be wishful thinking, but we can all be optimists and hope something will come up. We are still looking into alternatives. I think the MSBA has been more than patient.”
Wilder also voiced a similar wish for some flexibility, adding, “We would like to get some minor assurance that if we see another piece of property that’s better for the kids or for the town, that we could change it, if the people in the town are interested.”
Her rationale was tied to the town’s recent openness to building the new school on a smaller parcel of land.
“The architects and project manager were first looking at 18 to 20 acres, but now they need five or six acres, and there are pieces of property available in the five to six acre range (that weren’t previously considered), so I would like to pursue it along that line.”
Some of that flexibility, Wilder cited, was necessary because of what she perceived as a sudden deadline being thrust on town officials.
“I didn’t like how this was dumped on the selectmen’s lap. It’s now on the selectmen’s hands, and I take a little deference to that,” she said. ” I will encourage the other selectmen to sign it, though, and I would hope that it can be unanimous.”
Stewart, though, took issue with the perception that it became a rushed matter.
“We knew the deadline was coming up, so we weren’t surprised by it,” he said. “Dr. Weiss first discussed it about three months ago, and we had asked for an extension, when we were looking at the land off (Route 2′s) exit 20.”
What could potentially complicate matters further in getting site approval is how some residents on Tuesday chose to grasp at straws when complaining to selectmen about potential traffic issues they envisioned if a new school was built.
Upon hearing those concerns, one might envision a school being opened for 1,000 or more students, and that suddenly 10-year-old students were being gifted their own driver’s licenses and getting behind the wheel. But in knowing the site already houses an elementary school, with typical traffic made up of parents’ and teachers’ cars, to go with buses, and a police station and its usual traffic, such concerns seem largely exaggerated.
Especially when considering the district this year dealt with consolidating two schools into one, sending East Templeton Elementary students to Baldwinville Elementary, and dealt considerably well with the traffic impact.
Even with Baldwinville Elementary situated on a one-way street, and its student body having grown from 171 students in 2011 to 244 in 2012, no one would ever mistake it for trying to escape Fenway Park and its gridlock following a Red Sox game.
And by consolidating the combined Baldwinville Elementary with students from Templeton Center, it would likely add up to less than 350 students.
A school of that size is nothing new for Templeton, as the middle school had 445 students this year, and the high school 528.
Wilder wasn’t so willing to dismiss the concerns, though.
“You can construct a traffic pattern a certain way, and there are a lot of things that can be done, but we have to listen to the concerns of the people,” she said.
Knowing that aging schools aren’t solely a Templeton problem, it’s hard to imagine the MSBA sitting on a pile of reimbursement money for long if the town fails to make a positive decision on the site Monday, as districts that failed to make the earlier cut will then be chomping at the bit for another crack at the funds.
Simply reapplying also has its downsides, noted Carrie Koziol, chairman for the Templeton Elementary School Building Committee, as current school building projects are being reimbursed at a rate almost half that previously agreed for Templeton. While residents might dream for a return of the 80 to 90 percent reimbursement rate that existed during the 1990s, building committee member William Clabaugh noted that history has shown the rates continue to shrink, to where the longer Templeton holds off, the bigger the town’s bill will be when it does get around to building a new school.

Monday, August 5, 2019

Just so everyone is up to speed.

Diane Haley Brooks <1tuesdaygirl@gmail.com>
Mon 8/5/2019 3:58 PM
  • You;
  •  Kirk Moschetti;
  •  Emily Soltysik;
  •  Dr. Christopher Casavant;
  •  Hank Mason;
  •  Rick Moulton;
  •  Theresa Kasper;
  •  Timothy Alix;
  •  townadministrator@templeton1.org;
  •  Susan Varney
Ha ha ha!!!

Diane Haley Brooks, Realtor 

Jackie Leger Real Estate
362 Elm Street
Gardner, MA 01440

Direct: 978-430-2751
Office: 978-630-3600
Fax:  855-276-1049

Visit my website!  TuesdaysInTempleton.com

On Aug 5, 2019, at 2:05 PM, Kirk Moschetti <kirkmoschetti@gmail.com> wrote:
Bla Bla Bla 

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 5, 2019, at 2:04 PM, jeff bennett <j_bennett506@hotmail.com> wrote:
Since it is a town building line it up with selectmen office 
From: Emily Soltysik <esoltysik@nrsd.org>
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2019 12:30:51 PM
To: Diane Haley Brooks <1tuesdaygirl@gmail.com>; Dr. Christopher Casavant <ccasavant@nrsd.org>; Hank Mason <hmason@nrsd.org>; Kirk Moschetti <kirkmoschetti@gmail.com>; Rick Moulton <rmoulton@nrsd.org>; Theresa Kasper <TheresaKasper@verizon.net>; Timothy Alix <Tim.Alix@colliers.com>; townadministrator@templeton1.org <townadministrator@templeton1.org>; jeff bennett <j_bennett506@hotmail.com>; Susan Varney <svarney@nrsd.org>
Subject: TES Open House
 
Hello, 

Please feel free to forward this to anyone not listed, but should also be included.
It looks like the opening ceremony for the building will be on October 5th.  I am recommending 9-11a.m.  A quick ceremony followed by time for people to explore the building.  
Any thoughts and suggestions for the ceremony are welcomed!

Emily 

-- 
Emily Soltysik, Principal
She/Her
Templeton Elementary School
17 South Rd.
Templeton, MA 01468
978-939-8892

Sunday, August 4, 2019

Well, it has come to this, but I think it important enough to re-post and remind people of things done / stated, leading up to where we are regarding school funding:

from a statement released by Templeton Town Administrator, Carter Terenzini:

" . . .And - in terms of dollars to us - it means that even after all of the required cuts and disruption, even after all of the negative publicity counter to our efforts to attract and retain school choice students - a source of some $2.2 Million dollars of income to our district - and potential loss of local pride; the NRSD would still need an increase in local combined funding of some $235,000. That is roughly $195,500 to us and $39,500 to Phillipston; cuts we would both have to identify quickly in order to be prepared to propose cuts at the potential June Special Town Meeting to not only approve any recertified NRSD budget but to cut our FY '20 Opex budgets just approved at our respective Town Meetings. . . . "

I am not sure of the source of 2.2 million in revenue, but I do know what information is presented by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education;

Narragansett Regional School District receives the state cap of $5,000.00 for each school choice student that comes into the district (school choice receiving) while the district spends an average of $8,830.00 per each of those school choice students, so how do school choice students equate to positive revenue when you spend more on them than they bring?

Remember, or go look, at the budget message from the Narragansett Regional School District:

"A budget is a moral document. What we fund is what we value." So, I would ask each member of the school committee, do you value your community in which you live?

If you do, you would seriously rethink the district budget that you continue to put before the residents of your respective communities. You would reconsider your continued use of school choice as both a revenue source and an operational element to the entity which you are suppose to look after, the school, as an entity, but perhaps more importantly, the community from where each member of the school committee comes from. Your steadfast refusal to reconsider and use the numbers (dollar figures) that others (DLS, DESE) are using and agree are reliable, has the result of doing the opposite of what your budget message states. In my opinion, it shows you either do not value your community or you do not truly comprehend the meaning of your budget message.

Saturday, August 3, 2019

So, according to DESE web page information, as in Department of Secondary and Elementary Education / as in the commissioner of education, you the one who set the 1/12 budget for Narragansett Regional School district at exactly what they requested, states that each school choice students brings with them $5,000.00 but Narragansett Regional School District spends an average of $8,830.00 per student and Templeton and Phillipston residents are supposed to be happy with this; look at all the students who want to come to NRSD. Hey, you want to have your kids go to "Gansett, move to either Templeton or Phillipston.

from the web pages of the department of elementary and secondary education (DESE)
FY19 Final School Choice Tuition, June 2019
The school choice assessment and tuition amounts that will be incorporated into the June 30, 2019 local aid distribution have been finalized. On June 30th the State Treasurer's office will process the remaining portion of the annual assessments and tuition, net of the amounts paid in the monthly local aid distributions over the first eleven months of the fiscal year.
If you have any questions about this information, please contact Rob O'Donnell in the Office of District and School Finance at (781) 338-6512 or via email at rodonnell@doe.mass.edu.

School choice tuition rates Download Excel Document are calculated for regular and vocational programs. FY19 school choice tuition rates are set at 75 percent of the FY18 operating cost per full-time equivalent pupil for the receiving school district, with a cap of $5,000. All districts are now at that cap. In addition, the actual special education cost for each pupil with an individualized education plan is paid in full by the sending district. That amount is determined using the same rate methodology for specific services as is used in the special education circuit breaker program.
In prior years, the district summary showed a monthly breakdown of payments and assessments. However, a new report is available from the Division of Local Services that shows the monthly amounts for school choice and all other programs that are included in local aid distribution.
Sending and receiving district staff should review their final school choice rosters and tuition amounts for each student. The information has been placed in the DESE security portal's school choice claim form dropbox. These spreadsheets show each school choice pupil's name, address, enrollment dates, program, tuition and other information. District staff should contact DESE if they feel any of the information is not completely accurate so that follow-up can be done and, if necessary, adjustments can be made during FY20.
I do not want any students name or address, but I believe the total number of receiving school choice and sending school choice students enrollment dates, program tuition, etc should be included in any budget; people paying the bills should have up to date and accurate information and it appears it is available somewhere.
Trends in school choice for Narragansett school district:


FY FTE
Pupils
Tuition FTE
Pupils
Tuition
1996 2.0 10,712 22.6 68,228
1997 0.0 0 25.1 94,157
1998 0.0 0 34.3 111,175
1999 0.0 0 41.4 157,861
2000 0.0 0 50.9 195,725
2001 13.6 56,720 50.1 205,265
2002 31.6 158,025 52.1 215,809
2003 46.1 253,269 69.1 294,177
2004 54.4 285,457 77.7 358,707
2005 75.7 381,290 68.6 313,515
2006 98.4 456,837 71.0 322,967
2007 109.5 522,863 79.1 369,657
2008 114.1 598,163 91.3 432,477
2009 111.7 672,264 92.0 475,194
2010 130.1 702,148 99.9 545,648
2011 130.4 749,970 100.7 563,277
2012 144.4 803,812 111.3 620,991
2013 141.6 864,074 105.4 652,998
2014 152.6 837,136 127.0 765,773
2015 150.2 862,803 139.2 867,398
2016 185.7 1,089,601 141.6 794,982
2017 201.3 1,172,980 136.2 721,752
2018 217.1 1,337,639 121.7 641,734
2019 243.1 1,425,922 143.4 769,575

Staff Writer
Published: 8/2/2019 9:50:26 PM
Modified: 8/2/2019 9:50:12 PM



ORANGE — All of Orange’s elementary school students — from preschoolers to sixth-graders — should go to Fisher Hill Elementary School. 
That is the option architects and school officials are choosing to pursue after months of studying potential solutions for the Dexter Park project. The Dexter Park project is the town’s effort to replace Dexter Park Innovation School, which is currently the town’s school for third through sixth grade, and has the lowest possible rating from the Massachusetts School Building Authority. 
The town’s School Building Committee met with architects from Raymond Design Associates and Martin Goulet of Hill International Inc., which is managing the project on behalf of the town, Thursday night, and unanimously decided to pursue an addition to, and renovation of, Fisher Hill as the town’s future elementary school. 
“We have a great opportunity to build a great campus,” said School Committee member Alex Schwanz. “A school is not just the building itself.”
The plan now is to add a three-story wing to the northern side of the current Fisher Hill building, which would be where students in the third grade up will be educated. The new wing would also be where a new entrance to the school would be built, with a new drive to be added to control traffic flow. 
Preschool and kindergarten students would still be educated in the same areas they currently are, with a new playground to be built for them. 
The final result would not just be the three-story addition, however, and architects at RDA emphasized that the current building would be renovated, potentially getting new, larger windows to let in more natural light. 
The addition and renovation would happen during “phased construction,” with some construction happening in the summer and some during the school year, said Dan Bradford, project architect for RDA, with Dexter Park students staying in school at Dexter Park during construction. After the wing is completed, Dexter Park would be demolished, and new playing fields built over Dexter Park’s current footprint. 
Schwanz and others liked the idea of having more fields at Fisher Hill, and mentioned the possibility of town residents being able to use them during after-school hours for recreation. 
Many of the details of the project still need to be fleshed out, but, according to Goulet, initial price estimates put the project at around $50.9 million — around 80 percent of which is estimated to be reimbursed by the Massachusetts School Building Authority. 
Goulet said there are many variables, such as materials and window sizes, that could increase or decrease the price, and that he’ll be a “stick in the mud” reminding the town that “everything has a price tag.” 
Of course, this project will not happen if it is not accepted by Orange voters, who just rejected a half-million-dollar Proposition 2½ tax override this past week amid fiscal woes. 
Hill International and RDA expect to present a final schematic design and proposal for the project to be finished early next year, and for residents to vote on the project at the 2020 Annual Town Meeting. 
Build-time estimates are around 24 months — from when the construction starts — Bradford said. 
Background
The project chosen Thursday night is the result of an $875,000 “feasibility study” voters approved last year to examine potential solutions to the problems at Dexter Park.
Built in 1951, Dexter Park was designated a “Category 4” school by the Massachusetts School Building Authority in 2006. Category 4 is the worst rating from the authority, and demonstrates a need for substantial repairs or replacement. Only one of nine schools in the state with Category 4 status, Dexter Park was given the designation after boiler and heating problems, a leaking roof, asbestos and opaque windows.
The feasibility study — also being reimbursed by the state at a rate around 80 percent — looked at more than 20 options to fix these problems, including renovating Dexter Park, building a new school at the Ralph C. Mahar Regional School campus and resurrecting the old Butterfield School building, which was closed in 2015 to alleviate pressure on the town budget. 
Thursday night, only two options remained, the Fisher Hill addition and renovation, and a three-story entirely new building to be built in front of the current Dexter Park building. The latter option was eliminated for several reasons: First, it would be slightly more expensive than the Fisher Hill option, and second, only Dexter Park would be demolished, leaving Fisher Hill a decommissioned building overlooking the new school.
Selectboard Chairman Ryan Mailloux said it would be difficult to convince taxpayers to decommission another building, and described the option as having Fisher Hill “looming” over the new school, detracting from the new school’s value. 
A detailed schematic of the Fisher Hill addition and renovation is viewable on the project’s Facebook page titled “Dexter Park Improvements.”
Reach David McLellan at dmclellan@recorder.com or 413-772-0261, ext. 268