Friday, March 16, 2018

Vehicle excise tax, Porsche, BMW, Ford, the formula is the same

Excise bills are prepared by the Registry of Motor Vehicles according to the information on the motor vehicle registration. They are sent to city or town assessors who commit them to the local tax collectors for distribution and collection of payment. Cities and towns may also prepare their own bills based on excise data sent by the Registry in conformity with Registry requirements.
Local tax collectors are responsible for collecting the motor vehicle and trailer excise. Collectors may appoint deputy tax collectors or may enter into agreements with collection agencies to assist them in the collection of delinquent accounts. Money collected on all bills, excluding deputy tax collectors’ fees, is put into the municipal treasury. Generally, tax collectors and deputy tax collectors do not accept partial payment of an excise bill. Taxpayers should be prepared to pay the full amount due. There are no special considerations for financial hardship.

An excise at the rate of $25 per one thousand dollars of valuation (effective 1/1/81) is levied on each motor vehicle. Information on the value of a motor vehicle is accessed electronically through a data bank complete with valuation figures. Different sources provide the valuation figures depending upon whether the motor vehicle is an automobile, a truck, a motorcycle, or a trailer. For example, automobile valuations are derived from figures published in the National Automobile Dealers Association Official Used Car Guide (NADA), to which the Registry has electronic access. Most public libraries have copies of NADA and other motor vehicle official guides.
Figures are the manufacturers’ list prices for vehicles in their year of manufacture. Present market value, price paid, or condition are not considered for excise tax purposes. The excise tax law (M.G.L. c.60A, s.1) establishes its own formula for valuation for state tax purposes whereby only the manufacturer’s list price and the age of the motor vehicle are considered. The formula is as follows:
In the year preceding the model year
(brand new car released before model year)
50%
In the model year
90%
In the second year
60%
In the third year
40%
In the fourth year
25%
In the fifth and succeeding years
10%

13 comments:

  1. Anonymous12:54 PM

    I got rid of all my cars and use the COA. If COA goes away want am i going to do ?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous1:04 PM

    I hope someone from town can answer this person. I hope that this individual is able to go to meeting and voice their concern with other people who rely on this service.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:03 PM

      I am not against COA, but sounds to me like it's not very widely used, to keep funding it in hard times to appease a few that feel entitled, sorry when times are tough get rid of the costs that only help a few.

      Delete

  3. “ The program, which began in 1974, provides communities with resources to help address various community development needs, including funds for cities and towns to provide decent housing, living environments and expanded economic opportunities -- particularly for low- and moderate- income Americans.

    The Trump administration has defended its proposed cut by arguing that HUD studies found the CDBG "is increasingly not well targeted to the poorest communities and has not demonstrated a measurable impact on communities."
    Massachusetts local officials, however, have cautioned that the elimination of such funding would hurt after-school programs, economic development efforts, food pantries, fire departments and neighborhoods, among other things. “. - some info for context that may be helpful to see what is potentially ahead 2019 going forward , all politics is local as the saying goes http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2018/01/how_elimination_of_the_communi.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous1:29 PM

    A few years back, Gardner used CDBG funding to buy new signs for downtown businesses. I believe $10,000 on three signs. Waste O' Money.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Maybr that money was for that purpose ? Maybe that was needed ? Do you have a document to show us what you believe to be a purchase that is a waste o’ money so there is context ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. * yes apparently I need a dictionary or spell check or both -

      Delete
  6. Anonymous1:48 PM

    The money wa to be spent in downtown. They had $10k left, needed to spend it. Source was G-Vegas News.

    Problem with grants- spend money on stuff nobody would willingly pay taxes to support. But grants are "free money", right?

    ReplyDelete
  7. What’s your concern ? That money is “ waste, fraud and abuse ?” On the Federal scale ? Are you a Barbara Anderson CLT person as that seems to be “your” default position. If so that explains quite a bit.
    “ spend money on stuff nobody would be willingly pay taxes to support”
    CORRECT me if I’m wrong but I do believe the people in the BACK BAY area of Baldwinville ? Maybe ? Got some of that money that is not able to be raised by taxpayers in town because it was “ stuff nobody would willingly pay.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:56 PM

      The CDBG grant program worked wonders for the Back Bay. The program was designed to help such neighborhoods. It was a perfect fit. The town would never had put that kind of money into that neighborhood alone.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8:20 PM

      No that’s not a good use. why pay for union wages when we could have gotten it done cheaper ? the town doesn’t need to pay someone 50,000 plus benefits to dig a hole. the people ! Who use town water !! Should pay for that ! I don’t use town water ! How come I had to pay to fix that situation ?

      Delete
  8. I hope everyone that votes reads this as well before voting for budget requests , or voting for a person for public office or having someone appointed. http://www.templeton1.org/sites/templetonma/files/file/file/management_letter_fy13-fy16.pdf

    ReplyDelete