Sunday, June 25, 2017

Templeton selectmen should be thanking concerned Templeton resident Jeff Bennett for helping the selectmen avoid an open meeting law violation - failure to follow open meeting law guidelines with regards to how to properly post a public meeting.



posted by Jeff Bennett

10 comments:

  1. Maybe they should thank you for trying to teach them, but its obvious you haven't taught them by the latest events.
    How many violation of OML, Policies/Procedures and Ethics laws occurred in one meeting?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ever think they were just doing it to show the AG what they have to put up with.
    Some mistakes could be on purpose and with the mouths here it wouldn't be a surprise if they did a setup for you.
    Kind of proves a point about the oml they will be filing soon.
    Careful fellas big brother could be watching very closely.
    I hope!

    ReplyDelete
  3. LOL.........So they are purposefully violating regulations to show the AG what "they" are putting up with, really.

    Would you like a chance to restate that remark dave? Wow, just WOW!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm really trying to follow this reasoning Dave. How do you suppose this process would work. Someone violates rules, I point it out and blam,Kapow I'm what???? How does this "set me up" dave?

    I await your explanation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous8:06 PM

    BOS and Templeton Highway have a clueless spokesman

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous8:10 PM

    I think it's a conspiracy! Maybe Julie or Pete can advise or school me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Anon 8:10 pm

      Here at Conspiracy Central, the entire OML issue looks like a big DISTRACTION if not a false flag event.

      It truly is not that difficult to post a meeting according to the Open Meeting Law.

      So why the DISTRACTION?

      A DISTRACTION from the real financial issues facing this community and the leadership's inability to deal with these real financial issues.

      There is a meeting with the Department of Revenue scheduled for WEDNESDAY Night (at least as of this moment in time - could change?) This meeting has been scheduled at the request of the DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE - BUREAU OF LOCAL ACCOUNTS - DIVISION OF LOCAL SERVICES.

      THIS MEETING IS A BIG DEAL!

      I would urge as many people as possible to attend...if it is held.

      THIS LETTER was sent to the BoS on May 23, 2017. It was forwarded to the Advisory Committee around June 7, 2017. You should READ it!

      This document indicates a shortfall of $211,000 that will need to be remedied. If there is NO Free Cash, which is certified by the DOR, then cuts will need to be made to FY 18. FY 18 has a $100,000 deficit to begin the New Year (Fiscal - July 1, 2018).

      There may be difficulties setting the FY 18 tax rate. The lack of a tax rate further exacerbates Templeton's financial woes.

      None of the above takes into account the UNEXPLAINED reduction in Stabilization account:

      From $142,000 To $95,000

      I think the DOR might want an explanation of how that happened!

      The BoS were SUPPOSED to discuss a response or answer the DOR concerns at TONIGHT's Meeting.

      The Monday night BoS meeting has been rescheduled to THURSDAY night, which as any conspiracy theorist can confirm is AFTER Wednesday's meeting with the DOR.

      So has this level of incompetence been deliberate? Is just plain ignorance? Or is it misdirection - Look Squirrel?

      YOU BE THE JUDGE!

      My opinions as always,

      Julie Farrell - Putting the "FUN" in dysfunctional for over 20 years!

      Delete
  7. Bob like you stated prior. you don't have rental space in your head but i think there is plenty of space.Did you miss the "Ever think" part of the comment.

    Take your Anon droid and have a smoke or two.
    Medication needed.
    You both don't know what a clue is.
    Why are you spokespeople for the town.
    Two only makes a couple so hook up and be on each other,after the smokes.
    Poor Jeffy would have no one to stuck up for him if it weren't for you two.
    Or one ?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous7:38 AM

    Pretty weak Dave defense, Dave.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hope Julie cleared that up for you Bob.
    Try to keep up just clear that head for a while.
    Play defense Anon like it that way.
    Did you miss the "Ever think". It get confusing but people understand!
    Anon did!

    ReplyDelete