Tuesday, August 6, 2019

What happened to that school for 350 kids?


Considering all the ups and downs that Templeton has endured as part of its ongoing saga to build a new elementary school, it’s amazing that the Massachusetts School Building Authority has held firm this long in its willingness to reimburse the school’s construction at a rate of 60 percent.
Considering all the ups and downs that Templeton has endured as part of its ongoing saga to build a new elementary school, it’s amazing that the Massachusetts School Building Authority has held firm this long in its willingness to reimburse the school’s construction at a rate of 60 percent.
Board of Selectman Chairman Chris Stewart put the length of the effort into context: “They began talking about this elementary school when my kids were in elementary school, and they are graduating next year.”
For four of those years, Dr. Roseli Weiss carried the “new school” baton as the Narragansett superintendent, having taken it from Dr. Stephen Hemman, who had initially seemed to achieve some progress on that front before he retired in 2008. With Dr. Weiss having recently moved on to Middleborough as that district’s superintendent, Ruth Miller this month took the helm, seeking to eventually get a shovel into the ground to begin building a new facility for the town’s students.
The project has encountered many obstacles, with several sites eyed for the school having not panned out. Now, the current site of Templeton Center Elementary School has become the focus, and has been described by project backers as a last hope to keep the building authority’s support — and its current reimbursement rate.
Obtaining needed support to pursue the Templeton Center site, however, is proving to be a challenge.
“My hope is that the selectmen will all sign this (letter) and allow for it to go forward, as the rest of this (process to begin building) is many votes down the road,” noted Selectman Virginia Wilder.
Miller has ramped up the urgency level regarding the project in recent weeks, pointing to Monday’s meeting of the selectmen — at which discussion of the issue, and of the needed letter of support from the board, is set to take place — as the point at which the town must proceed or “absolutely lose the project.”
To Stewart, though, this recent push to consider the Templeton Center site could easily be explained.
“The changing of the guard of the school committee and the superintendent has changed their perspective of the sites,” said Stewart. “Dr. Weiss didn’t want to go to Templeton Center, with it probably not the best place to put it, but now they realize that’s pretty much all they have. ”
Even if that’s the case, Stewart is still banking on the MSBA to provide town and school officials with some degree of flexibility.
“The MSBA is kind of getting fed up with us changing our minds,” he said. “Even so, it might be wishful thinking, but we can all be optimists and hope something will come up. We are still looking into alternatives. I think the MSBA has been more than patient.”
Wilder also voiced a similar wish for some flexibility, adding, “We would like to get some minor assurance that if we see another piece of property that’s better for the kids or for the town, that we could change it, if the people in the town are interested.”
Her rationale was tied to the town’s recent openness to building the new school on a smaller parcel of land.
“The architects and project manager were first looking at 18 to 20 acres, but now they need five or six acres, and there are pieces of property available in the five to six acre range (that weren’t previously considered), so I would like to pursue it along that line.”
Some of that flexibility, Wilder cited, was necessary because of what she perceived as a sudden deadline being thrust on town officials.
“I didn’t like how this was dumped on the selectmen’s lap. It’s now on the selectmen’s hands, and I take a little deference to that,” she said. ” I will encourage the other selectmen to sign it, though, and I would hope that it can be unanimous.”
Stewart, though, took issue with the perception that it became a rushed matter.
“We knew the deadline was coming up, so we weren’t surprised by it,” he said. “Dr. Weiss first discussed it about three months ago, and we had asked for an extension, when we were looking at the land off (Route 2′s) exit 20.”
What could potentially complicate matters further in getting site approval is how some residents on Tuesday chose to grasp at straws when complaining to selectmen about potential traffic issues they envisioned if a new school was built.
Upon hearing those concerns, one might envision a school being opened for 1,000 or more students, and that suddenly 10-year-old students were being gifted their own driver’s licenses and getting behind the wheel. But in knowing the site already houses an elementary school, with typical traffic made up of parents’ and teachers’ cars, to go with buses, and a police station and its usual traffic, such concerns seem largely exaggerated.
Especially when considering the district this year dealt with consolidating two schools into one, sending East Templeton Elementary students to Baldwinville Elementary, and dealt considerably well with the traffic impact.
Even with Baldwinville Elementary situated on a one-way street, and its student body having grown from 171 students in 2011 to 244 in 2012, no one would ever mistake it for trying to escape Fenway Park and its gridlock following a Red Sox game.
And by consolidating the combined Baldwinville Elementary with students from Templeton Center, it would likely add up to less than 350 students.
A school of that size is nothing new for Templeton, as the middle school had 445 students this year, and the high school 528.
Wilder wasn’t so willing to dismiss the concerns, though.
“You can construct a traffic pattern a certain way, and there are a lot of things that can be done, but we have to listen to the concerns of the people,” she said.
Knowing that aging schools aren’t solely a Templeton problem, it’s hard to imagine the MSBA sitting on a pile of reimbursement money for long if the town fails to make a positive decision on the site Monday, as districts that failed to make the earlier cut will then be chomping at the bit for another crack at the funds.
Simply reapplying also has its downsides, noted Carrie Koziol, chairman for the Templeton Elementary School Building Committee, as current school building projects are being reimbursed at a rate almost half that previously agreed for Templeton. While residents might dream for a return of the 80 to 90 percent reimbursement rate that existed during the 1990s, building committee member William Clabaugh noted that history has shown the rates continue to shrink, to where the longer Templeton holds off, the bigger the town’s bill will be when it does get around to building a new school.

Monday, August 5, 2019

Just so everyone is up to speed.

Diane Haley Brooks <1tuesdaygirl@gmail.com>
Mon 8/5/2019 3:58 PM
  • You;
  •  Kirk Moschetti;
  •  Emily Soltysik;
  •  Dr. Christopher Casavant;
  •  Hank Mason;
  •  Rick Moulton;
  •  Theresa Kasper;
  •  Timothy Alix;
  •  townadministrator@templeton1.org;
  •  Susan Varney
Ha ha ha!!!

Diane Haley Brooks, Realtor 

Jackie Leger Real Estate
362 Elm Street
Gardner, MA 01440

Direct: 978-430-2751
Office: 978-630-3600
Fax:  855-276-1049

Visit my website!  TuesdaysInTempleton.com

On Aug 5, 2019, at 2:05 PM, Kirk Moschetti <kirkmoschetti@gmail.com> wrote:
Bla Bla Bla 

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 5, 2019, at 2:04 PM, jeff bennett <j_bennett506@hotmail.com> wrote:
Since it is a town building line it up with selectmen office 
From: Emily Soltysik <esoltysik@nrsd.org>
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2019 12:30:51 PM
To: Diane Haley Brooks <1tuesdaygirl@gmail.com>; Dr. Christopher Casavant <ccasavant@nrsd.org>; Hank Mason <hmason@nrsd.org>; Kirk Moschetti <kirkmoschetti@gmail.com>; Rick Moulton <rmoulton@nrsd.org>; Theresa Kasper <TheresaKasper@verizon.net>; Timothy Alix <Tim.Alix@colliers.com>; townadministrator@templeton1.org <townadministrator@templeton1.org>; jeff bennett <j_bennett506@hotmail.com>; Susan Varney <svarney@nrsd.org>
Subject: TES Open House
 
Hello, 

Please feel free to forward this to anyone not listed, but should also be included.
It looks like the opening ceremony for the building will be on October 5th.  I am recommending 9-11a.m.  A quick ceremony followed by time for people to explore the building.  
Any thoughts and suggestions for the ceremony are welcomed!

Emily 

-- 
Emily Soltysik, Principal
She/Her
Templeton Elementary School
17 South Rd.
Templeton, MA 01468
978-939-8892

Sunday, August 4, 2019

Well, it has come to this, but I think it important enough to re-post and remind people of things done / stated, leading up to where we are regarding school funding:

from a statement released by Templeton Town Administrator, Carter Terenzini:

" . . .And - in terms of dollars to us - it means that even after all of the required cuts and disruption, even after all of the negative publicity counter to our efforts to attract and retain school choice students - a source of some $2.2 Million dollars of income to our district - and potential loss of local pride; the NRSD would still need an increase in local combined funding of some $235,000. That is roughly $195,500 to us and $39,500 to Phillipston; cuts we would both have to identify quickly in order to be prepared to propose cuts at the potential June Special Town Meeting to not only approve any recertified NRSD budget but to cut our FY '20 Opex budgets just approved at our respective Town Meetings. . . . "

I am not sure of the source of 2.2 million in revenue, but I do know what information is presented by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education;

Narragansett Regional School District receives the state cap of $5,000.00 for each school choice student that comes into the district (school choice receiving) while the district spends an average of $8,830.00 per each of those school choice students, so how do school choice students equate to positive revenue when you spend more on them than they bring?

Remember, or go look, at the budget message from the Narragansett Regional School District:

"A budget is a moral document. What we fund is what we value." So, I would ask each member of the school committee, do you value your community in which you live?

If you do, you would seriously rethink the district budget that you continue to put before the residents of your respective communities. You would reconsider your continued use of school choice as both a revenue source and an operational element to the entity which you are suppose to look after, the school, as an entity, but perhaps more importantly, the community from where each member of the school committee comes from. Your steadfast refusal to reconsider and use the numbers (dollar figures) that others (DLS, DESE) are using and agree are reliable, has the result of doing the opposite of what your budget message states. In my opinion, it shows you either do not value your community or you do not truly comprehend the meaning of your budget message.

Saturday, August 3, 2019

So, according to DESE web page information, as in Department of Secondary and Elementary Education / as in the commissioner of education, you the one who set the 1/12 budget for Narragansett Regional School district at exactly what they requested, states that each school choice students brings with them $5,000.00 but Narragansett Regional School District spends an average of $8,830.00 per student and Templeton and Phillipston residents are supposed to be happy with this; look at all the students who want to come to NRSD. Hey, you want to have your kids go to "Gansett, move to either Templeton or Phillipston.

from the web pages of the department of elementary and secondary education (DESE)
FY19 Final School Choice Tuition, June 2019
The school choice assessment and tuition amounts that will be incorporated into the June 30, 2019 local aid distribution have been finalized. On June 30th the State Treasurer's office will process the remaining portion of the annual assessments and tuition, net of the amounts paid in the monthly local aid distributions over the first eleven months of the fiscal year.
If you have any questions about this information, please contact Rob O'Donnell in the Office of District and School Finance at (781) 338-6512 or via email at rodonnell@doe.mass.edu.

School choice tuition rates Download Excel Document are calculated for regular and vocational programs. FY19 school choice tuition rates are set at 75 percent of the FY18 operating cost per full-time equivalent pupil for the receiving school district, with a cap of $5,000. All districts are now at that cap. In addition, the actual special education cost for each pupil with an individualized education plan is paid in full by the sending district. That amount is determined using the same rate methodology for specific services as is used in the special education circuit breaker program.
In prior years, the district summary showed a monthly breakdown of payments and assessments. However, a new report is available from the Division of Local Services that shows the monthly amounts for school choice and all other programs that are included in local aid distribution.
Sending and receiving district staff should review their final school choice rosters and tuition amounts for each student. The information has been placed in the DESE security portal's school choice claim form dropbox. These spreadsheets show each school choice pupil's name, address, enrollment dates, program, tuition and other information. District staff should contact DESE if they feel any of the information is not completely accurate so that follow-up can be done and, if necessary, adjustments can be made during FY20.
I do not want any students name or address, but I believe the total number of receiving school choice and sending school choice students enrollment dates, program tuition, etc should be included in any budget; people paying the bills should have up to date and accurate information and it appears it is available somewhere.
Trends in school choice for Narragansett school district:


FY FTE
Pupils
Tuition FTE
Pupils
Tuition
1996 2.0 10,712 22.6 68,228
1997 0.0 0 25.1 94,157
1998 0.0 0 34.3 111,175
1999 0.0 0 41.4 157,861
2000 0.0 0 50.9 195,725
2001 13.6 56,720 50.1 205,265
2002 31.6 158,025 52.1 215,809
2003 46.1 253,269 69.1 294,177
2004 54.4 285,457 77.7 358,707
2005 75.7 381,290 68.6 313,515
2006 98.4 456,837 71.0 322,967
2007 109.5 522,863 79.1 369,657
2008 114.1 598,163 91.3 432,477
2009 111.7 672,264 92.0 475,194
2010 130.1 702,148 99.9 545,648
2011 130.4 749,970 100.7 563,277
2012 144.4 803,812 111.3 620,991
2013 141.6 864,074 105.4 652,998
2014 152.6 837,136 127.0 765,773
2015 150.2 862,803 139.2 867,398
2016 185.7 1,089,601 141.6 794,982
2017 201.3 1,172,980 136.2 721,752
2018 217.1 1,337,639 121.7 641,734
2019 243.1 1,425,922 143.4 769,575

Staff Writer
Published: 8/2/2019 9:50:26 PM
Modified: 8/2/2019 9:50:12 PM



ORANGE — All of Orange’s elementary school students — from preschoolers to sixth-graders — should go to Fisher Hill Elementary School. 
That is the option architects and school officials are choosing to pursue after months of studying potential solutions for the Dexter Park project. The Dexter Park project is the town’s effort to replace Dexter Park Innovation School, which is currently the town’s school for third through sixth grade, and has the lowest possible rating from the Massachusetts School Building Authority. 
The town’s School Building Committee met with architects from Raymond Design Associates and Martin Goulet of Hill International Inc., which is managing the project on behalf of the town, Thursday night, and unanimously decided to pursue an addition to, and renovation of, Fisher Hill as the town’s future elementary school. 
“We have a great opportunity to build a great campus,” said School Committee member Alex Schwanz. “A school is not just the building itself.”
The plan now is to add a three-story wing to the northern side of the current Fisher Hill building, which would be where students in the third grade up will be educated. The new wing would also be where a new entrance to the school would be built, with a new drive to be added to control traffic flow. 
Preschool and kindergarten students would still be educated in the same areas they currently are, with a new playground to be built for them. 
The final result would not just be the three-story addition, however, and architects at RDA emphasized that the current building would be renovated, potentially getting new, larger windows to let in more natural light. 
The addition and renovation would happen during “phased construction,” with some construction happening in the summer and some during the school year, said Dan Bradford, project architect for RDA, with Dexter Park students staying in school at Dexter Park during construction. After the wing is completed, Dexter Park would be demolished, and new playing fields built over Dexter Park’s current footprint. 
Schwanz and others liked the idea of having more fields at Fisher Hill, and mentioned the possibility of town residents being able to use them during after-school hours for recreation. 
Many of the details of the project still need to be fleshed out, but, according to Goulet, initial price estimates put the project at around $50.9 million — around 80 percent of which is estimated to be reimbursed by the Massachusetts School Building Authority. 
Goulet said there are many variables, such as materials and window sizes, that could increase or decrease the price, and that he’ll be a “stick in the mud” reminding the town that “everything has a price tag.” 
Of course, this project will not happen if it is not accepted by Orange voters, who just rejected a half-million-dollar Proposition 2½ tax override this past week amid fiscal woes. 
Hill International and RDA expect to present a final schematic design and proposal for the project to be finished early next year, and for residents to vote on the project at the 2020 Annual Town Meeting. 
Build-time estimates are around 24 months — from when the construction starts — Bradford said. 
Background
The project chosen Thursday night is the result of an $875,000 “feasibility study” voters approved last year to examine potential solutions to the problems at Dexter Park.
Built in 1951, Dexter Park was designated a “Category 4” school by the Massachusetts School Building Authority in 2006. Category 4 is the worst rating from the authority, and demonstrates a need for substantial repairs or replacement. Only one of nine schools in the state with Category 4 status, Dexter Park was given the designation after boiler and heating problems, a leaking roof, asbestos and opaque windows.
The feasibility study — also being reimbursed by the state at a rate around 80 percent — looked at more than 20 options to fix these problems, including renovating Dexter Park, building a new school at the Ralph C. Mahar Regional School campus and resurrecting the old Butterfield School building, which was closed in 2015 to alleviate pressure on the town budget. 
Thursday night, only two options remained, the Fisher Hill addition and renovation, and a three-story entirely new building to be built in front of the current Dexter Park building. The latter option was eliminated for several reasons: First, it would be slightly more expensive than the Fisher Hill option, and second, only Dexter Park would be demolished, leaving Fisher Hill a decommissioned building overlooking the new school.
Selectboard Chairman Ryan Mailloux said it would be difficult to convince taxpayers to decommission another building, and described the option as having Fisher Hill “looming” over the new school, detracting from the new school’s value. 
A detailed schematic of the Fisher Hill addition and renovation is viewable on the project’s Facebook page titled “Dexter Park Improvements.”
Reach David McLellan at dmclellan@recorder.com or 413-772-0261, ext. 268

Friday, August 2, 2019

For the most part, you can substitute Narragansett for Medfield and paint a pretty accurate picture of the situation regarding school choice and its effect on both Templeton and Phillipston.

 (from a 2018 article wicked local newsbank)
In Massachusetts, a 1991 initiative known as inter-district school choice gives parents the option of enrolling their children in a public school district in a community other than their hometown. While the law lets each school district decide whether to accept out-of-district students, no district can deny its students the right to leave.
“School choice money can be a major factor in determining both the revenue you gain and the revenue you lose for many school districts,” said Glenn Koocher, executive director of the Massachusetts Association of School Committees. “Depending on where you are, districts may really depend on that money to sustain the services they’re able to provide to students ... School choice has made districts a little more competitive with each other.”
In 2016 and 2017, Medfield had around eight students leave the town for school choice, adding up to around $50,000 in assessments. That amounts to around 0.14 percent of the school budget, but some parents say that money should be spent on salaries.
Since state funding follows the students, school choice has had the unintended consequence of widening the gap between affluent suburban districts and cash-strapped urban and rural school systems, according to some critics. When a student leaves one public school system for another, state funding goes from the sending district to the receiving district in the form of school choice tuition. To soften the blow for sending districts, the state caps school choice tuition payments at $5,000 per student.
For districts that gain and lose large numbers of school choice students, the aggregate financial impact can be large.
In Medfield, the town has opted not to receive students through school choice every year since the program’s inception in 1991.
School Superintedent Jeffrey Marsden said there are a number of reasons Medfield doesn’t accept students from other districts, including concern about class sizes and the budget issues that would be created.
“We’ve had conversations about it, but we just didn’t think it was a good idea,” Marsden said. “Part of it is that we had projections of class sizes being high.”
This school year, some classes are up to 25 students, well above the district’s goal of 20 or 21 per classroom.
“It just doesn’t make any sense to add more students from outside the district when we’re already looking into building a new elementary school,” Town Administrator Michael Sullivan said.
The budgetary numbers for school choice also don’t add up, Sullivan said.
“We spend around $14,000 to $15,000 per student, and if we’re going to get $5,000 per student from school choice, that’s not a very good deal,” he said.
Marsden added that Medfield residents have chosen to invest in their schools as a service to the children in town.
“Strong education is part of the philosophy of this community,” he said. “An overwhelming percentage of residents moved here because of the schools. The community really values and treasures its schools, and we’re all very proud of that fact. To bring someone from outside the district to only get $5,000 back, there’s a fairness factor involved. We’re also not running a business, trying to pack kids into our schools to create revenue. This community values spending money to educate its own children.”
Sullivan said school choice can work well for other districts, especially when they have a higher percentage of commercial and industrial properties. Businesses pay taxes without adding children to the school system, so a city like Cambridge or Boston can afford to add students to the district from outside. But since Medfield is 94 percent residential, with about 21 percent of its residents in the school system, it would be much harder to afford the extra students, Sullivan said.
“The schools are doing a very good job, so people move here for the schools,” he said.
At least one parent doesn’t agree with Marsden and Sullivan. Chris McCue wrote in a letter to the Medfield Press that she believes school choice is “a potentially viable option for addressing budget shortfalls.”
“Holliston received $969,229 in School Choice tuition this year, and was able to restrict participation to 6th, 7th, 9th and 11th grades, according to a recent report on the MA Department of Education website,” she said. “On the flip side, Medfield paid $56,234 in FY18 school choice tuition for students who left to attend receiving districts.” 
McCue also said that the committee is not following the law. The state requires each district to discuss school choice each year, at a public hearing held before June 1. Last year, the school committee voted to opt out of school choice at its June 5 meeting.
“It’s unacceptable that the school committee has not held the required public hearings on school choice as required by law,” McCue said. “How does Medfield get away with not adhering to the law, and then put on the table potential teacher layoffs in 6th grade due to declining enrollment?”
Marsden said the district is meeting state requirements and following the example set by other districts.
“By having school choice on the posted agenda for a public meeting, that satisfies the requirement for a public hearing,” he said. “To say that we are not holding these hearings is just not true. Does the state require the meeting be held before June 1? Yes. Does just about every other district make their decision during the first meeting in June? Yes.”
Whatever opinion parents and residents have about the school budget, they are welcome to attend the next school committee meeting. A public hearing, specifically for the purpose discussing next year’s school budget, will be held on Monday, Jan. 29 at 7:30 p.m. in the Lowell Mason Auditorium at Medfield High School.
Opposite experiences among neighbors
In the small town of Avon, more than a quarter of all students enrolled in the public school system come from other communities on school choice. According to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, school choice students brought more than $958,000 into Avon last fiscal year.
“The choice revenue is close to a million dollars, or about 11 percent of our budget,” Avon Superintendent Paul Zinni said. “When you’re talking about 11 percent added into your budget, that’s significant.”
In nearby Brockton and Randolph, the situation is drastically different. Randolph lost more than $850,000 due to school choice last year, while Brockton lost $1.3 million, according to the DESE.
Brockton schools have struggled financially in recent years, and losing students to both school choice and charter schools hasn’t helped.
“We’ve cut almost every program and extracurricular,” said Brockton’s chief budget officer, Aldo Petronio. “We’ve laid off probably 150 teachers out of 1,400 over the past few years.”
Petronio, though, said the impact of school choice has been minimal compared to charter schools. Because of the cap on school choice tuition, Brockton loses $5,000 per student leaving on school choice. Each student who leaves for a charter school, however, draws more than $11,000 in funding away from the district, he said.
“I think charter schools should be funded the same way school choice is funded, with a cap of $5,000 per student,” Petronio said.
Koocher said similar concerns are common in urban districts losing large numbers of students to charter schools.
“If a charter school comes in and disrupts the entire economy of scale, that can be enraging to a district,” Koocher said. “With school choice at $5,000 per kid, you’re willing to live with that even if you’re not happy with it. But with charters, you could lose $18,000 per kid. It’s a white hot, if not blue hot, public policy issue because you can really cripple a district with a charter school draining the money.”
Marketing themselves
In recent years, many public schools have undertaken more efforts to market themselves to parents in the community, highlighting programs and success stories. The intent is to retain some of the families thinking about sending their children elsewhere.
Milford Superintendent of School Kevin McIntyre said such outreach efforts have become much more common throughout the state.
“I would say a decade ago, a lot of schools didn’t necessarily have to market to their own residents,” he said. “Now we find we have to share all the great things that are happening in the Milford Public Schools on a regular basis with members of our community.”
Milford lost $1.2 million in funding due to 198 students leaving in fiscal 2017, but brought in more than $584,000 from 103 pupils opting into the district, according to the DESE. Internal district data McIntyre provided is slightly different from the state data, showing 112 students coming in and 193 leaving.
“We definitely have a school choice deficit, but over the last few years, we’ve been seeing that trend start to reverse,” McIntyre said. “We’re seeing the number of students choicing in increasing dramatically.”
The increase in students coming in has led to Milford having to turn away some school choice students in certain grades due to limited capacity. When demand exceeds capacity, the state requires receiving school districts to hold a blind lottery. Preference can be given to siblings of students already in the school system.
“Sometimes a neighboring district may have a program we don’t offer that may meet a student’s needs. Conversely, a student may come into Milford because of a program we have that isn’t available in their home district,” McIntyre said. “Giving parents options has been a positive thing.”