Templeton Watch
All material on this blog is directed to members of the general public and is not intended to be read by my fellow Board members, nor do I intend for any readers to convey such material directly or indirectly to my fellow Board members.
Saturday, April 4, 2026
Wednesday, March 25, 2026
Speed limits in thickly settled or business districts
Overview
MGL c. 90 § 17C defines a thickly settled or business district as "the territory contiguous to any way which is built up with structures devoted to business, or the territory contiguous to any way where dwelling houses are situated at such distances as will average less than two hundred feet between them for a distance of a quarter of a mile or over."
In 2016, legislation was passed (Sections 193 and 194 of Chapter 218 of the Acts of 2016) to create two new sections to MGL c.90§17C.
- Section 193 allows a municipality to opt-in to Section 17C of Chapter 90 of the MGL, thereby reducing the statutory speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph on any or all city- or town-owned roadways within a thickly settled or business district. The legislation also requires cities and towns to notify MassDOT of these changes.
- Section 194 creates Section 18B of Chapter 90 of the MGL, allowing municipalities to establish regulatory 20 mph safety zones. Since this creates a regulatory speed limit, the MUTCD requires an engineering study prior to the establishment of the safety zone, and it should conform to the guidance found in the MassDOT Procedures for Speed Zoning.
If a municipality opts-in, it will not supersede any existing posted speed limit. The legislation only affects streets that are currently governed by a statutory speed limit. If an existing special speed regulation is in place, it will continue to govern.
MassDOT recommends that if a municipality opts-in to MGL c. 90 § 17C, that it does so on a city- or town-wide basis to avoid potential confusion for drivers. However, cities and towns do have the option to opt-in on a street-by-street basis. Once a municipality has opted-in to MGL c. 90 § 17C, it is required to notify MassDOT.
Saturday, March 21, 2026
Ashburnham, MA Town Meeting
ARTICLE 2: To see if the Town will vote to authorize a PILOT payment based on the annual kilowatt sales of the Light Department multiplied by a per kilowatt value. from the Municipal Light Plant Funds, to the town treasury, as authorized by its Light Board in accordance with Chapter 164 of the General Laws of the Commonwealth, or act in relation thereto.
(Requested by the Municipal Light Department)
SELECTMEN RECOMMEND: YES
CAPITAL PLAN. COMM. RECOMMEND: N/A
ADVISORY BD. RECOMMEND: YES
TAX RATE IMPACT: N/A
Brief Explanation: The PILOT agreement is tied to the Pilot payment in the annual kilowatt sales of the light department multiplied by a per kilowatt value. This was put in place for FY13 to ease the calculation and establish a standard process for future years. In FY13 it is estimated we will receive $66,345. ARTICLE 2 VOTED: On motion of Richard Sicard it was moved that articles 1 through 8 be approved by consent. Unanimous “YES”
How things work:
Wednesday, March 18, 2026
from The Gardner News:
Templeton highest paid employees.
| First Name | Last Name | Department | Gross Wages |
| John | Driscoll | Light | $167,248.58 |
| Derek | Hall | Police | $131,099.00 |
| Thomas | Berry | Light | $129,692.43 |
| Nicholas | Houston | Light | $120,814.87 |
| Joseph | Parker | Light | $119,602.84 |
| Tyler | Gearin | Light | $115,290.90 |
| Michael | Bennett | Police | $114,151.69 |
| Shane | Egan | Light | $114,134.78 |
| Nicholas | Malnati | Police | $107,796.60 |
| Eric | Smith | Police | $107,571.97 |
| Kyle | Daniels | Fire | $107,067.45 |
| John | White | Light | $106,806.24 |
| Steven | Flis | Police | $104,427.40 |
| Natan | Hagopian | Fire | $94,065.72 |
| Scott | Schwinger | Water | $93,926.44 |
| Robert | Szocik | DPW | $92,721.23 |
| Jennifer | Belliveau | Light | $90,189.38 |
| Jeffrey | Aldrich | Sewer | $89,513.85 |
| Caleb | Matson | Police | $88,186.82 |
| Andrew | Francis | Fire | $86,621.36 |
Tuesday, March 17, 2026
FYI - the impact to the average single family home (SFH) relative to the FY’2026 tax rate if the following Overrides/amounts added to the tax levy had occurred, rounded up to the next penny. Some information to go with it, keep in the mind for FY’2026 that $1 on the tax rate raised $1,199,579 and the average SFH was valued at $378,285, and the tax rate was at $11.87 per thousand dollars of assessed value, making the average tax bill of a SFH around $4,490.24.
Below is an example of a 3 tiered approach to an override question.
|
Override Amount |
Increase in Tax Rate ($/1000) |
Increase in Tax Amount on the
Average SFH |
Result: Total Tax Amount on
the Average SFH |
|
$ 1,000,000 |
$ 0.83 |
$ 313.98 |
$ 4,804.22 |
|
$ 2,000,000 |
$ 1.67 |
$ 631.74 |
$ 5,121.98 |
|
$ 3,000,000 |
$ 2.50 |
$ 945.72 |
$ 5,435.96 |