TO: Board of Selectmen
FROM: Carter Terenzini, Town Administrator
RE: Administrator’s Weekly Report
DATE: January 25, 2018
CC: All Departments
Public Works
Highway Department:
The director attended the Templeton Center Elementary school meeting on
Tuesday Evening and the Scout Hall meeting on Thursday. A crew was dispatched to Cottage Lane to
fill a location where a resident had cut into the road. Flowing water was undermining the road surface
there. The trackless snowplow was out clearing sidewalks after the last snow storm. Cold patching of
potholes was done on Barre Rd. Henshaw and Stonebridge, as well as Central and Bridge Streets. Two
stop signs were replaced. Due to the pounding rain and freezing temperatures sand and salting was a
constant battle to keep the roads safe. A process change was made to the way that Barre and Dudley
Roads are sanded. We now are sanding the lanes, not in the center of the road as was done in the past.
Repairs to sanders and plows were maintained and cleaned.
Perhaps all roads should be sanded in lanes rather than down the middle?
On the addendum to this report:
MMMA association meeting: Item of note is challenge of board of selectmen doing evaluations now that it has been determined the individual input sheets - if used at a public meeting - are a public record and not part of a personnel file.
from the current Massachusetts Open Meeting Law:
The ten purposes for which a public body may vote to hold an executive session are:
1. To discuss the reputation, character, physical condition or mental health, rather than
professional competence, of an individual, or to discuss the discipline or dismissal of,
or complaints or charges brought against, a public officer, employee, staff member or
individual. The individual to be discussed in such executive session shall be notified in
writing by the public body at least 48 hours prior to the proposed executive session;
provided, however, that notification may be waived upon written agreement of the
parties.
another item from the addendum report;
Taming the OPEB (other post employment benefits) beast:
Prime point was to establish a funding approach, no matter how small and to stick to it annually, looking for long term solutions to this long term problem. In conversation afterward, presenter thought our approach of a modest free cash contribution annually and pushing enterprise funds to get fully funded at a faster pace was reasonable for now.
My problem with this approach is the same for the stabilization funds, without a budget line item, there is no consistency with the amount, it is only a percentage of any free cash. Why not budget a dollar figure each year as a part of operating costs to put money aside for these items?
Of course, putting down a hard dollar figure item with in a budget is problematic with prop 2 1/2 limitations and the ever expanding government approach, as in the now started full time fire department, which adds more costs to OPEB. Perhaps it is time to outsource things that can be done in that way and cut the number of town employees, as it is not the taxpayers responsibility to provide jobs for people just so they can have one. These are serious problems and require hard decisions. My opinion is that anyone who is running for elective office and posts a sign saying "save dispatch" is just looking for votes and not really thinking of the bigger picture nor the stability of the Town.
Remember that last year, there were education costs of
Narragansett Regional school district of $6,006,424.00
Monty Tech - $ 638,131.00
Debt for High school $ 436,384.00
Total Town budget presented to Town Meeting by the selectmen was approximately 15.5 million dollars.
Templeton Town financial policy voted on by the selectmen states one time funds will not be used to fund the operating budget, but here we have a statement by the Town Administrator on how free cash or one time funds will be used to cover yearly costs to fund OPEB. Either we have a policy with no real plan or we do not collect enough in taxes to cover all of the planned expenses. With the push for new taxes - meals tax, me thinks it is the latter. I also do not think this problem is going to be solved or dealt with by way of an absent board of selectmen. Show or go!
I watched the TESBC meeting from 1/23 and noticed a couple things that made me go , Huh!
ReplyDeleteIt appears the TESBC is a 16 member Committee. On 1/23 I could only count 7 members at the TESBC meeting. If my regulation readings are correct they did not have a quorum.
The thing that bothers me more than anything is that if you look at that Committees meeting minutes it appears that on the regular 7 members are absent.
This committee has 3 members of the BOS appointed to it of which I believe none have attended since 11/2017.
We are building a 47 million dollar school and only half the committee can be bothered to show up.
In regards to the CLASSll license granted to the “ Baldwinville goat farm land “ or Nationanwide Auto Recycling LLC ———— am I correct that a $26,000,00 Bond and proof of is required ?
ReplyDeleteThis viewer also was noticing the nod and wink by the “good corporate neighbor “ and the Town elected and appointed officials in regards to “this town has NO CLASSlll licenses at this time “ ———- please make yourselves familiar with the diffences ( environment) of a Class 2, 3 .
Does this “good corporate neighbor “ who operates in Lancaster Ma now need a Classlll ? As I am under the impression that this is exactly the same process used in Lancaster Ma .
I look forward to seeing answers to my questions here .
FYI what town gets the excise tax for vehicles if applicable ?
^ 26,000.00 sorry about the typo
ReplyDeleteGood question Bob, I was also driving by the old MBW salvage that I thought would sold to a "town official". I couldn't help but notice that the place is packed with what appears to be a thousand cars or more. Is that place still licensed?
ReplyDeleteChapter 140 Section 58 in part reads:
ReplyDelete(1) The person shall obtain a bond, or equivalent proof of financial responsibility as described in paragraph (5), and continue in effect a surety bond or other equivalent proof of financial responsibility satisfactory to the municipal licensing authority in the amount of $25,000 executed by a surety company authorized by the insurance department to transact business in the commonwealth. The bond or its equivalent shall be for the benefit of a person who purchases a vehicle from a Class 2 licensee, and who suffers loss on account of:?
Who thinks that this facility will not be “ crushing or taking apart cars “ ? Ya know ... leaking of : antifreeze , oils ... metals - lead , cadmuim , nickel etc .... that’s the impression given by this meeting — as Doug Morrison asked ... and piped in was TA “ Templeton has no CLASSIII currently and Nationwide knows that “ I’m paraphrasing but lucky ! It’s on video and downloaded . So the old MBW new owner “ town official “ They have any connection with this land ?
ReplyDeleteIs the property at 411 Baldwinville rd ?
ReplyDeleteIs this the listing ? http://www.kelleher-sadowsky.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Templeton-Baldwinville-Rd411.pdf
I’m asking about the “ old MBW “ as it states it currently holds 3 licenses . So, are those transferable or what ? Maybe even use that land since it hold the license for the CLASS 3 ? Just asking as something stinks here
ReplyDeleteBob,
ReplyDeleteAt the October 10 BOS meeting the class 2/3 licenses were transfered to Franklin Park Enterprises Inc with the listed owner as Kirk Moschetti.
The class 2 appears to limit to 25 cars and no rebuilding, but the class 3 authorizes rebuilding aludding to a "plot plan"...........
Bob,
ReplyDeleteBoth of those documents are available on the Oct 10 BOS agenda page under documents.....
Hmm, I got a call tonight that several acres were cleared, trees taken down, and loam removed in the past few weeks to accomodate the thousands of cars coming to moshetti's place.
ReplyDeleteAnd YES he was involved in getting the new place at the goat farm sold and even was ordered to stop working because he did not file a site plan before starting site work
Only in Templeton!!!
Thanks Bob M . I/we will follow up with this information .
ReplyDeleteWasn’t the planning board PROPOSAL TO CHANGE ZONING thwarted at the special ... 11/2017 meeting - when you have no one showing up ) thanks to vocal abutters and
ReplyDeletepeople paying attention . Who’s on the planning board that would have a conflict
I. Are you a municipal employee for conflict of interest law purposes?
You do not have to be a full-time, paid municipal employee to be considered a municipal employee for conflict of interest purposes. Anyone performing services for a city or town or holding a municipal position, whether paid or unpaid, including full- and part-time municipal employees, elected officials, volunteers, and consultants, is a municipal employee under the conflict of interest law. An employee of a private firm can also be a municipal employee, if the private firm has a contract with the city or town and the employee is a "key employee" under the contract, meaning the town has specifically contracted for her services. The law also covers private parties who engage in impermissible dealings with municipal employees, such as offering bribes or illegal gifts. Town meeting members and charter commission members are not municipal employees under the conflict of interest law MASS.gov
Not sure if your serious or not,
ReplyDeleteBut Every member of the the planning board had land that the zoning change would have helped financially.
I’m not and that is quite disturbing news. thankyou
ReplyDelete