Sunday, March 3, 2019

Interesting proposed by-law for Templeton: Rude, Indecent speech or behavior / $50.00 fine allowed - enforcer - police department or designee.
How much does it cost per day to house a prisoner because your honor, I cannot afford the $50.00 and I have a tooth ache that requires attention and seeing how I will be in custody of law enforcement, they need to take care of my medical needs or else a law suit happens.
Who decides rude behavior or speech; what is the definition and would that violate my free speech rights, seeing how one can burn an american flag. Seems like a power grab by the police department / selectmen.
That by-law proposal is on page 414 under the by-law section of the budget/legislative package on the town website.
Get Town Hall in order before moving sewer collections:

from the fiscal year 2018 Town audit management letter.

3. Closing Checklists
Closing checklists are employed by accounting departments to better ensure that all routine and non-routine accounting transactions and reconciliations are performed and the final outputs (i.e., the Town’s balance sheet and Schedule A) are reviewed for accuracy and completeness. The use of closing checklists is commonplace in private industry but is seldom used in the public sector. The Town had great difficulty getting its free cash approved; in the end it was approved at the expected amount, but the Department of Revenue process was not used properly. We recommend that the Town Accountant, Treasurer/Collector develop a closing checklist to monitor and track the annual accounting close in order for the process to be more efficient in the future.

6. Indirect Costs (repeated from prior year) Water, sewer, and light indirect costs are approved at Town Meeting, and transfers are made annually into the General Fund. However, they are not reflected as transfers on the tax recap, but instead as miscellaneous revenues and expenses. Furthermore, the transfers are not made if sufficient resources do not exist in the enterprise funds, and there is no formal process to the calculation of indirect costs from year to year. A more comprehensive calculation of indirect costs should be undertaken, documented, and signed off by the Town and enterprise funds with updates performed every few years.

9. Treasurer/Collector Office (repeated from prior year)
In our letter to management dated March 23, 2017 we identified 17 critical areas in the Treasurer/Collectors Office that needed to be addressed. Many of those have been addressed through fiscal year 2018, however some remain and should be addressed in the current fiscal year. Those are highlighted as follows:
• While efforts are made to collect cash from department heads weekly, there is no formal policy regarding cash held by departments outside the Treasurer’s Office. The Treasurer was unaware that all Town cash is under the Treasurer’s control, and the Treasurer has the duty to force effective internal control policies on all departments who handle cash. 
• Presently, the Collector does not use a lock box to collect taxes. A lock box is essentially a third-party collector of taxes. Taxpayers mail their payments to a Post Office box, and the third-party collector deposits the funds for the Town and posts activity for all those who have paid. Daily, an electronic file is then sent to the Town where payments are uploaded automatically to the Town’s system.
• Cash forecasts are currently not prepared as part of a monthly routine. This is a critical process for Towns that are cash stressed; we suggest such a process is implemented immediately.

Saturday, March 2, 2019

How convenient . . .
 Posted on the Templeton Town web site under sewer collections report as:

As a matter of sound financial management practice, those responsible for determining payments due the town should not also be charged with collecting those payments. Therefore, we recommend that officials separate responsibility for creating the commitment that authorizes the collection of taxes, fees or other charges due the municipality from the collection function.”

It is stated that is from the financial review of 2009 by the Massachusetts Department of Revenue,

That is not the complete opinion from the DOR financial review:

19. Centralize the Collection of Taxes, Fees and Other Charges As a matter of sound financial management practice, those responsible for determining payments due the town should not also be charged with collecting those payments. Therefore, we recommend that officials separate responsibility for creating the commitment that authorizes the collection of taxes, fees or other charges due the municipality from the collection function. Presently, the light & water plant and sewer department create a commitment, and, at the same time, are responsible for receiving payments. This approach may require that personnel currently operating elsewhere be reallocated to the collector’s office in order to process the additional customer volume.

Portion in bold was left off of the posting, why is that?


The present Town Treasurer / Collector was not aware she was responsible for the tracking of the Town's cash!

The recommendations over the years has always been collections; not billing, not personnel. We have elected Sewer Commissioners for a reason!

Other town departments collect money after generating a bill and those are not addressed by the selectmen; why not? It really is about the money, selectmen Brooks "can we charge sewer and will that help the general fund." BOS meeting, April 2, 2018.

Saturday, February 23, 2019

How does a selectmen know before hand what questions will be asked, never mind answered, before a meeting even takes place? Guess you have to watch the movie to see the ending.



TEMPLETON — The Board of Selectmen and officials from the Sewer Department will be discussing the option of moving bill collection from the sewer department to town hall at a meeting this Wednesday.
Currently the bills are collected in the Sewer Department itself, but ideally the town would like to see that money collected by the town’s treasurer in town hall. Officials have looked at this plan since about 2009 when the Department of Revenue and different auditors recommended the change. The idea is that it would save employee time and it would save the Sewer Department money, while being more efficient since the rest of the towns billing is done through town hall. While the Sewer Department has voiced their support for that plan, they have wanted to hold off on letting the town handle their billing until the town had their own finances in order.
“We are not against collections being in town hall,” Sewer Chairman Mark Moschetti said. “The 2009 DOR report said it, various audits said it. ... In 2009 when the DOR said that, I said in open meeting we agree but until the town got their books in order we would continue doing it how we are doing it, and they agreed then too.”
This past year, Selectman Diane Haley-Brooks, who was not immediately available for comment, has pushed for more studies to be done on taking over sewer’s collection, and how that would be done. Earlier this month, Town Administrator Carter Terenzini gave his report recommending the change to the Sewer Department.
“It should save them thousands of dollars and hundred plus man hours,” selectmen Chairman John Caplis said. “We aren’t trying to hurt them in any way, they have this perception we want their money. We don’t want their money. The sewer funds are for them, not the town, and we are strict on that.”
Caplis also claims that town bylaws suggest that all collection and handling with money should be done by the accountant and treasurer.
“If you look at all the things the DOR said, it’s opinion, it’s suggested, it’s not a law,” Moschetti said. “My take is that the bylaw says all collections owed to the town are to be handled by the treasurer/collector, but I think it’s different. .... We are an enterprise, I am not sure if that affects us, but we aren’t against that anyways. We want to work together on how it will be done. We have to figure out how it will work we are not in the same place.”
Moschetti reiterates they are not against the plan, but want to work with the Board about how it will be executed.
“We have to figure out how they will inform us of what bills have been paid and what not,” Moschetti said. “We aren’t against this; we just have to figure out how it will work.”
The Sewer Department will have their official opinions aired out at the meeting before the town moves forward or abandons the plan.
“A lot of the questions we have and they have will be answered at the meeting Wednesday,” Caplis said.


Friday, February 22, 2019

603 CMR 41.00 - Regional school district budgets.

(3)  Reconsideration of Rejected Budgets
(a)If the budget is not approved by two-thirds of the members, the regional school committee shall have 30 days from the date of disapproval by more than one-third of the members to reconsider, amend, and adopt a revised budget. With the approval of the Commissioner, this 30-day period may be extended an additional 15 days. Where the local appropriating authority is a town meeting and the annual town meeting is dissolved prior to voting on the budget, the budget shall be deemed disapproved by that member as of the date of such dissolution.
(b)The revised budget adopted by the regional school committee and the assessments corresponding to such budget may be less than, equal to, or greater than the amounts in the previously adopted budget.
(c)Within seven days following the regional school committee's adoption of a revised budget, the treasurer of the regional school district shall calculate and certify the assessment of each member and shall transmit the assessments and a copy of the revised budget to the members. Each member's local appropriating authority shall have 45 days from the date of the regional school committee's vote to meet and consider the revised budget.
(d)The approval of a revised budget shall be as set forth in 603 CMR 41.05(2)(a). If a local appropriating authority does not vote on the revised budget within the 45-day period, that member shall be deemed to have approved the revised budget.
(e)In a regional school district comprised of three or more members, if the revised budget is not approved, the regional school committee shall again reconsider, amend, and adopt a revised budget. The revised budget shall be resubmitted to the members pursuant to the provisions of 603 CMR 41.05(3).
(f)In a regional school district comprised of two members, if the revised budget is not approved by both members, the regional school committee shall again reconsider, amend, and adopt a revised budget and shall convene a district-wide meeting, at which the revised budget shall be placed before all voters eligible to vote at said meeting. If a majority of voters at this district-wide meeting votes to approve the revised budget, such vote shall constitute approval. If a majority of voters at this meeting votes to approve a greater or lesser amount for the budget, such amount shall be placed before the regional school committee for its ratification. If the regional school committee by a two-thirds vote ratifies this amount, it shall constitute approval. If the regional school committee rejects such greater or lesser amount, it shall again reconsider, amend, and adopt a revised budget and shall reconvene a district-wide meeting pursuant to the provisions of 603 CMR 41.05(3)(f).
(g)A district-wide meeting convened in accordance with 603 CMR 41.05(3)(f) shall only consider budgets based on the statutory assessment method.
(h)A regional school committee may reconsider, amend, and adopt a revised budget at any time prior to the approval of a previously adopted budget.
(i)If a local appropriating authority votes to approve an adopted budget subsequent to the required date for such action but prior to the regional school committee's revision of the budget, such vote shall be deemed valid.
(j)Whenever a member's assessment is reduced to a smaller amount than previously appropriated by the local appropriating authority, that appropriation shall automatically be reduced to the lesser amount.
(4)  Establishment of Budgets by the Commissioner
(a)If the operating budget for a regional school district has not been approved by July 1, the superintendent of schools shall notify the Commissioner, and the Commissioner shall establish an interim monthly budget for the regional school district. The interim monthly budget shall be one-twelfth of the regional school district's budget for the prior fiscal year or such higher amount as the Commissioner may determine. The interim monthly budget shall remain in effect until an operating budget is approved pursuant to 603 CMR 41.05(3) or December 1, whichever comes earlier.
(b)If a regional school district's budget has not been approved by December 1 of the fiscal year, the Commissioner shall assume fiscal control of the regional school district pursuant to M.G.L. c.71, §16B, and 603 CMR 41.07, and shall establish the final budget for the fiscal year.
(c)Whenever the Commissioner establishes an interim or final budget for a regional school district under the provisions of this section, the treasurer of the regional school district shall calculate and certify to the members their respective assessments. Every member shall pay its respective assessment in accordance with the payment schedule in the regional agreement. The appropriation of funds to pay an assessment ordered by the Commissioner under 603 CMR 41.05(4) shall not be deemed approval by the municipality of the district's budget.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 

DIVISION OF LOCAL SERVICES TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SECTION

Overrides and Exclusions

Contingent Appropriations: Towns only can approve a contingent appropriation (Ch. 59 Sec. 21) which is usually a single additional expenditure, or multiple appropriations made subject to subsequent voter approval of a funding source. Most often, that funding source is additional tax revenue raised through an override, debt exclusion or capital expenditure exclusion. While town meeting must approve the contingent appropriation, only the selectmen can actually place the referendum on the ballot for voter approval. When a contingent appropriation is approved at an annual town meeting, the related referendum must be placed before the voters prior to September 15. When a special town meeting approves contingent spending, the override or exclusion vote must occur within 90 days. In any case, a failed referendum may be returned to the voters on subsequent ballots, but if not approved by the applicable deadline, the appropriation is null and void.








Wednesday, February 20, 2019

How transparent is Templeton Town Governance?   

From: jeff bennett <j_bennett506@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 4:22 PM
To: Holly Young; Terenzini, Carter; Caplis, John
Subject: public records request
 
Wednesday, February 20, 2019
Holly Young
Town of Templeton
Town Hall, 160 Patriots Road
Templeton, MA 01438
Re: Massachusetts Public Records Request

Holly Young:
This is a request under the Massachusetts Public Records Law (M. G. L. Chapter 66, Section 10). I am requesting that I be provided a copy of the following records:
A report of the Veterans Advisory Board, per Templeton Town general by-law - article LVI: Veterans Advisory Board. According to the by-law, a report from this board is to be provided to the Board of Selectmen in December of each year.
A copy of a contract between Town of Templeton and Narragansett Regional School District involving a wind turbine. Per Massachusetts General Law, chapter 164, section 56C, Every  municipal light commission or manager thereof, who makes or executes a contract on behalf of a municipal lighting plant, where the amount involved is five thousand dollars or more, shall furnish said contract or a copy thereof to the city or town auditor within one week after its execution.
I would request, if possible, that these records be provided in electronic form.
I recognize that you may charge reasonable costs for copies, as well as for personnel time needed to comply with this request.
The Public Records Law requires you to provide me with a written response within 10 business days. If you cannot comply with my request, you are statutorily required to provide an explanation in writing.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey Bennett
77 Partridgeville Road, Templeton MA 01468
978-360-4634