How does a selectmen know before hand what questions will be asked, never mind answered, before a meeting even takes place? Guess you have to watch the movie to see the ending.

Templeton set to discuss sewer bill collection at Wednesday meeting Chance Viles TEMPLETON — The Board of Selectmen and officials from the Sewer Department will be discussing the option of movi...

TEMPLETON — The Board of Selectmen and officials from the Sewer Department will be discussing the option of moving bill collection from the sewer department to town hall at a meeting this Wednesday.

Currently the bills are collected in the Sewer Department itself, but ideally the town would like to see that money collected by the town’s treasurer in town hall. Officials have looked at this plan since about 2009 when the Department of Revenue and different auditors recommended the change. The idea is that it would save employee time and it would save the Sewer Department money, while being more efficient since the rest of the towns billing is done through town hall. While the Sewer Department has voiced their support for that plan, they have wanted to hold off on letting the town handle their billing until the town had their own finances in order.

“We are not against collections being in town hall,” Sewer Chairman Mark Moschetti said. “The 2009 DOR report said it, various audits said it. ... In 2009 when the DOR said that, I said in open meeting we agree but until the town got their books in order we would continue doing it how we are doing it, and they agreed then too.”

This past year, Selectman Diane Haley-Brooks, who was not immediately available for comment, has pushed for more studies to be done on taking over sewer’s collection, and how that would be done. Earlier this month, Town Administrator Carter Terenzini gave his report recommending the change to the Sewer Department.

“It should save them thousands of dollars and hundred plus man hours,” selectmen Chairman John Caplis said. “We aren’t trying to hurt them in any way, they have this perception we want their money. We don’t want their money. The sewer funds are for them, not the town, and we are strict on that.”

Caplis also claims that town bylaws suggest that all collection and handling with money should be done by the accountant and treasurer.

“If you look at all the things the DOR said, it’s opinion, it’s suggested, it’s not a law,” Moschetti said. “My take is that the bylaw says all collections owed to the town are to be handled by the treasurer/collector, but I think it’s different. .... We are an enterprise, I am not sure if that affects us, but we aren’t against that anyways. We want to work together on how it will be done. We have to figure out how it will work we are not in the same place.”

Moschetti reiterates they are not against the plan, but want to work with the Board about how it will be executed.

“We have to figure out how they will inform us of what bills have been paid and what not,” Moschetti said. “We aren’t against this; we just have to figure out how it will work.”

The Sewer Department will have their official opinions aired out at the meeting before the town moves forward or abandons the plan.

“A lot of the questions we have and they have will be answered at the meeting Wednesday,” Caplis said.

603 CMR 41.00 - Regional school district budgets.

(3)  Reconsideration of Rejected Budgets

(a)If the budget is not approved by two-thirds of the members, the regional school committee shall have 30 days from the date of disapproval by more than one-third of the members to reconsider, amend, and adopt a revised budget. With the approval of the Commissioner, this 30-day period may be extended an additional 15 days. Where the local appropriating authority is a town meeting and the annual town meeting is dissolved prior to voting on the budget, the budget shall be deemed disapproved by that member as of the date of such dissolution.

(b)The revised budget adopted by the regional school committee and the assessments corresponding to such budget may be less than, equal to, or greater than the amounts in the previously adopted budget.

(c)Within seven days following the regional school committee's adoption of a revised budget, the treasurer of the regional school district shall calculate and certify the assessment of each member and shall transmit the assessments and a copy of the revised budget to the members. Each member's local appropriating authority shall have 45 days from the date of the regional school committee's vote to meet and consider the revised budget.

(d)The approval of a revised budget shall be as set forth in 603 CMR 41.05(2)(a). If a local appropriating authority does not vote on the revised budget within the 45-day period, that member shall be deemed to have approved the revised budget.

(e)In a regional school district comprised of three or more members, if the revised budget is not approved, the regional school committee shall again reconsider, amend, and adopt a revised budget. The revised budget shall be resubmitted to the members pursuant to the provisions of 603 CMR 41.05(3).

(f)In a regional school district comprised of two members, if the revised budget is not approved by both members, the regional school committee shall again reconsider, amend, and adopt a revised budget and shall convene a district-wide meeting, at which the revised budget shall be placed before all voters eligible to vote at said meeting. If a majority of voters at this district-wide meeting votes to approve the revised budget, such vote shall constitute approval. If a majority of voters at this meeting votes to approve a greater or lesser amount for the budget, such amount shall be placed before the regional school committee for its ratification. If the regional school committee by a two-thirds vote ratifies this amount, it shall constitute approval. If the regional school committee rejects such greater or lesser amount, it shall again reconsider, amend, and adopt a revised budget and shall reconvene a district-wide meeting pursuant to the provisions of 603 CMR 41.05(3)(f).

(g)A district-wide meeting convened in accordance with 603 CMR 41.05(3)(f) shall only consider budgets based on the statutory assessment method.

(h)A regional school committee may reconsider, amend, and adopt a revised budget at any time prior to the approval of a previously adopted budget.

(i)If a local appropriating authority votes to approve an adopted budget subsequent to the required date for such action but prior to the regional school committee's revision of the budget, such vote shall be deemed valid.

(j)Whenever a member's assessment is reduced to a smaller amount than previously appropriated by the local appropriating authority, that appropriation shall automatically be reduced to the lesser amount.

(4)  Establishment of Budgets by the Commissioner

(a)If the operating budget for a regional school district has not been approved by July 1, the superintendent of schools shall notify the Commissioner, and the Commissioner shall establish an interim monthly budget for the regional school district. The interim monthly budget shall be one-twelfth of the regional school district's budget for the prior fiscal year or such higher amount as the Commissioner may determine. The interim monthly budget shall remain in effect until an operating budget is approved pursuant to 603 CMR 41.05(3) or December 1, whichever comes earlier.

(b)If a regional school district's budget has not been approved by December 1 of the fiscal year, the Commissioner shall assume fiscal control of the regional school district pursuant to M.G.L. c.71, §16B, and 603 CMR 41.07, and shall establish the final budget for the fiscal year.

(c)Whenever the Commissioner establishes an interim or final budget for a regional school district under the provisions of this section, the treasurer of the regional school district shall calculate and certify to the members their respective assessments. Every member shall pay its respective assessment in accordance with the payment schedule in the regional agreement. The appropriation of funds to pay an assessment ordered by the Commissioner under 603 CMR 41.05(4) shall not be deemed approval by the municipality of the district's budget.

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 

DIVISION OF LOCAL SERVICES TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SECTION

Overrides and Exclusions

Contingent Appropriations: Towns only can approve a contingent appropriation (Ch. 59 Sec. 21) which is usually a single additional expenditure, or multiple appropriations made subject to subsequent voter approval of a funding source. Most often, that funding source is additional tax revenue raised through an override, debt exclusion or capital expenditure exclusion. While town meeting must approve the contingent appropriation, only the selectmen can actually place the referendum on the ballot for voter approval. When a contingent appropriation is approved at an annual town meeting, the related referendum must be placed before the voters prior to September 15. When a special town meeting approves contingent spending, the override or exclusion vote must occur within 90 days. In any case, a failed referendum may be returned to the voters on subsequent ballots, but if not approved by the applicable deadline, the appropriation is null and void.

How transparent is Templeton Town Governance?   

From: jeff bennett <j_bennett506@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 4:22 PM
To: Holly Young; Terenzini, Carter; Caplis, John
Subject: public records request

 

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Holly Young
Town of Templeton
Town Hall, 160 Patriots Road
Templeton, MA 01438

Re: Massachusetts Public Records Request

Holly Young:

This is a request under the Massachusetts Public Records Law (M. G. L. Chapter 66, Section 10). I am requesting that I be provided a copy of the following records:

A report of the Veterans Advisory Board, per Templeton Town general by-law - article LVI: Veterans Advisory Board. According to the by-law, a report from this board is to be provided to the Board of Selectmen in December of each year.

A copy of a contract between Town of Templeton and Narragansett Regional School District involving a wind turbine. Per Massachusetts General Law, chapter 164, section 56C, Every  municipal light commission or manager thereof, who makes or executes a contract on behalf of a municipal lighting plant, where the amount involved is five thousand dollars or more, shall furnish said contract or a copy thereof to the city or town auditor within one week after its execution.

I would request, if possible, that these records be provided in electronic form.

I recognize that you may charge reasonable costs for copies, as well as for personnel time needed to comply with this request.

The Public Records Law requires you to provide me with a written response within 10 business days. If you cannot comply with my request, you are statutorily required to provide an explanation in writing.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey Bennett
77 Partridgeville Road, Templeton MA 01468

978-360-4634

Please Templeton Selectmen, read the Department of Revenue Financial Review of 2009!

Notice what it says concerning Sewer Commissioners (Selectmen not mentioned)

1. Build a Multi-Year Revenue and Expenditure Forecast:
The sewer department needs to build a realistic multi-year revenue and expenditure forecast. Absent a solid projection, a true fiscal picture of the future spending in relation to estimated revenue is lacking. Financial forecasting not only allows officials to better understand and quantify the long-range impact of policy proposals, it contributes in a significant way to the annual budget process by working hand-in-hand with the capital planning and fee setting process.

2. Establish a Comprehensive Capital Improvement Program: The sewer department should outline a formal capital improvement program built on a multi-year plan that embodies clear spending priorities. An important resource would be the inventory of fixed assets the town was required to produce under GASB 34. A five year plan, updated annually, would be a useful tool and the basis of the department’s submission of capital requests to the town’s capital planning committee for review.

 3. Review Fee Schedule: Because the sewer department operates under a fee-for-service model, it is financially prudent that officials review fees annually to verify that the total operating costs are adequately covered by revenues. A review should include an examination of direct and indirect costs, anticipated capital outlays, debt service, or other operating costs.

4. Make Decisions on the Use of Retained Earnings: Retained earnings reflect the year-end surplus in the enterprise fund that, once certified by DOR, may be appropriated to support sewer-related purposes. The sewer commissioners should plan long-term for the accumulation and use of retained earnings. We typically recommend that a percentage of retained earnings be retained to cover ongoing maintenance costs and anticipated capital needs.

5. Outline Indirect Cost Formula: An indirect cost is a cost incurred or the time devoted by other town employees to enterprise purposes. We recommend that the town accountant develop a basis for calculating an annual indirect cost reimbursement to the town. The formula should have long-term applicability in a way that produces a fair and consistent annual reimbursement for services provided. To begin, survey each office to account for the amount of staff time spent on sewer enterprise fund activities.

An annual reimbursement from the enterprise fund to cover costs of any services provided by other town departments. There is no mention of cutting employees, transferring employees from one department to another. The spin needs to stop!

TO: Board of Selectmen
FROM: Carter Terenzini, Town Administrator
RE: Administrator’s Weekly Report
DATE: February 14, 2019
CC: All Departments



Weekly Report:
We have received the $30k grant from the Community Compact to fund the study of our (T’ton and P’ston) shared Fire/EMS Departments. We have circulated the first cut at a Draft w/P’ston and hope to finalize it and have it out on the street by 02/28. Budget work has consumed the week with the so-called “Last Call” budget going out to all departments for review and comment. It does provide for a 2 ½% increase to Monty Tech and the NRSD but – for the moment – assumes the balance of their needs are met with their Over-Ride. The Request for Letters of Interest was issued to fifteen parties we were able to identify, and we included the BES Disposition flyer in it as well. We will continue to try to identify additional parties over the next two weeks or so. We received the perambulation results from Hubbardston (MGL Ch. 42 §2). Staff is researching when this was last done with our adjoining towns as it is statutory required every five year (although it is honored in the breach across most of the state).

NRSD - their override???

Templeton, like all other communities in the Commonwealth, must provide a sum of money to provide for an adequate education of children. So, the Narragansett Regional School District / school committee decide on a budget, level funded, level service, increase in staffing, etc., and then the NRSD comes up with the cost for Phillipston and Templeton. According to state law, the district sends the assessment or bill, to Templeton, it is up to the selectmen to come up with a way or plan on how to deal with that "bill", for service.

The selectmen have options on how to pay that bill, one of those options is an increase of the levy, or prop 2 1/2 override; it is the responsibility of the selectmen to do that, not the school committee. The selectmen are charged with the finncial affairs of the Town, they are charged with placing items on the Town Meeting warrant. If there is an override, it will be a Templeton override, to pay Templeton charges, assessments or bills. The school district is a cost of the Town and there fore it would be, if called for, a Templeton override, it would be the selectmen's override, not the NRSD override.

The selectmen can try to spin it this way or that way, but in the end, if the route chosen is a prop 2 1/2 override, it will be for the operating costs of the Town of Templeton, it will be on the selectmen!

Email to selectmen of Templeton - no response as of yet.

Reading the FY 2018 audit again, I find what I consider contradicting statements:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of the governmental activities, business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the Town of Templeton, Massachusetts, (the “Town”) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2018, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, we considered the Town’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Town’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Town’s internal control. 

4. Sewer User Charges (repeated from the prior year) The Sewer Department continues to handle all aspects of the user charges associated with the activity. Therefore, the internal controls surrounding this activity are not as complete as they should be. We continue to suggest that the Collector’s office be given the responsibility of collecting the user charges. This will provide better segregation and internal controls over the activity and provide a more efficient reconciliation process. 

"as they should be" and "we continue to suggest" - Those two statements are opinion based, no mention of any law being broken, no mention of any by-law being violated (I am still awaiting the explanation  of the chairman's statement that sewer dept. is violating town by-law (s).

Bottom line, it is all about the money; Selectmen Brooks asking if sewer enterprise fund can be billed and if so, will this help our general fund? (see selectmen meeting of April2, 2018) Reducing hours of benefited sewer employees will save health care costs. If you wish to save money, move collections to town hall @ collectors office and do not charge the enterprise fund to do this, I mean, people, including sewer rate payers, already pay taxes to operate the treasurer/collector office, including any assistants/part-time personnel.

Note: By not providing a return envelope, any resident now has to buy an envelope which in reality, amounts to another fee. Yes, that point might be considered petty, but as I stated, I am all in. How much tax money is going to be spent conferring with town counsel as you try to enforce an opinion from someone else; auditor and DOR?