Friday, July 14, 2017

for those who may be reading challenged or, the meeting minutes posted are from the June 21, 2017 meeting and not July 12 meeting, since there was no OML documents on agenda, that subject was not discussed and why would it have been? It was not on the agenda, unlike BOS, Advisory does not have a secretary changing the agenda during the meeting!

If anyone is interested, look at the Templeton annual town reports fro 2005, 2006 and 2007. You will find Doug Morrison listed as chairman of Advisory Committee (you may see it improperly listed as Advisory Board) In 2005, the committee report is 3 pages in length, 2006 and 2007, the report is 2 pages in length. Included in those reports; activity of the Town's reserve fund, as in an accounting of taxpayer monies. So why would any selectmen state that a committee they served on had only one page reports in the Annual Town report, something that is easily checked. Perhaps selectmen thought no one would take the time, well, someone did take the time and the only one page statement is a lie. Intentional or not, it was untrue.


Note: On the Templeton Town website, there is an item concerning the swearing in of newly or reappointed individuals from the June 29, 2017 selectmen meeting for various positions and committees. One item, the veterans service agent is listed as John Caplis. I believe there was a woman appointed that evening as Veterans service agent. Ooops! If you check the town web site, under veterans services, you will find Jessica Butts as the new veterans service agent.

As for that resignation suggestion, the answer is still the same, with regards to me resigning from Advisory - pound sand! No, not happening.


posted by Jeff Bennett

7 comments:

  1. Maybe it's all part of the apparent games being played. If you not sure what I mean take a look at the end of the last BOS meeting. The apparent "concern" about responding to the OML complaints in a timely manner. You have the Chairman and Selectman performing a "whose on first" routine regarding 14 days to respond. Does anyone truly believe that in having to respond to 6 OML complaints in 2 weeks that nobody read the rules stating they have 14 BUSINESS days to respond. According to the BOS meeting more than one Selectman has been getting advice from the AG's office regarding how to respond, but never about when? If nobody did look or ask you have to wonder why, right? Does it seem like good management if they did not look/ask when they would be legally responsible to respond. These are games being played on taxpayers time for what purpose?

    I do have to say that I appreciate that Selectman Fortes is pushing to get the web page fixed so the taxpayers of Templeton can access accurate information. That concern didn't appear to be shared even with the difficulty in getting the appointment info correct.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've been told that its being reported that discussions regarding merging the Manager/TA positions between Templeton and Winchendon are going well. I haven't been able to attend the meetings but I hope the depths of our needs are being discussed and managed by our Reps. Looking forward to seeing the proposal. My initial feel is that Mr. Hickey would be an upgrade for Templeton taxpayers.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If anyone needs a reminder on how to file an Open Meeting Law complaint, it was posted on the "other" blog!
    How to File an Open Meeting Law Complaint 101

    ReplyDelete
  4. #8 oml agenda it's on the other real blog.

    ReplyDelete
  5. David,

    #8 OML DOCUMENTS-------- This was because the Advisory Committee wasn't on the mailing list for the OML DOCUMENTS Rich Curtis sent out in March.

    Damn, we had this conversation when the letter went out and you , david smart,in response to me asking why it came from Rich responded saying Rich was the State contact and has been and, and, and................


    That was it. It was handled. You can watch it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous3:52 PM

    Dave is thick. You'll have to explan it real slow. Maybe his free boots are too tight.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Gee Jeffanon with the oml violations going around it would make sense to hash it out or just waite and see.
    JEFFAnon your still and always will be a "COWARD".
    It's too bad there are still people like that.
    I thought they died out after the last round of it!

    ReplyDelete