Consider an under ride vote on tax levy??


What is an Under ride?
Proposition 2 1/2 allows a community to reduce its levy limit by passing an under ride. When an under ride is
passed, the levy limit for the year is calculated by subtracting the amount of the under ride. The under ride results in a permanent decrease in the levy limit of a community because it reduces the base upon which levy limits are calculated for future years.
A majority vote of a community’s selectmen, or town or city council (with the mayor’s approval if required by law) allows an under ride question to be placed on the ballot. An under ride question may also be placed on the ballot by the people using a local initiative procedure, if one is provided by law. Under ride questions must state a dollar amount and require a majority vote of approval by the electorate.


With around one million dollars in so called "free cash" in 2017 and stated estimates of around eight thousand dollars left from FY 2018, perhaps it is time for an under ride for Templeton.

Free cash is a revenue source that results from the calculation, as of July 1, of a community's remaining, unrestricted funds from its operations of the previous fiscal year based on the balance sheet as of June 30. It typically includes actual receipts in excess of revenue estimates and unspent amounts in departmental budget line items for the year just ended, plus unexpended free cash from the previous year. Free cash is offset by property tax receivables and certain deficits, and as a result, can be a negative number.

The Bureau of Accounts (BOA) certifies free cash as of July 1 after the submission of the municipality's balance sheet. Updates to free cash must also be certified by the Director of Accounts. These certifications can only be appropriated from the date of certification through June 30. As of each July 1, a municipality's free cash available for appropriation is $0 until a new balance sheet is received and a new free cash amount is certified.

If selectmen cannot or will not ensure that taxpayer/voter's wishes, per their votes at town meeting, are carried out, then selectmen should have less funding available to them for budget planning.
When something is presented and voted on, selectmen should ensure it happens; when selectmen fail to do this, then steps need to be taken to show selectmen who is really in charge: the residents!

Is there real transparency in Templeton Town Hall or is there something else going on?

Why is it that things that are voted on at annual town meeting are ignored and things that are not actually voted on at town meeting get put in place?



A new budget format was used and presented without an article or motion put before Town Meeting, yet, money appropriated and voted on at Town meeting for non union raises for the sewer department are ignored by the selectmen. Just what is going on and who is in charge? Are the selectmen aware of what is going on? They are and they have so far not acted.


ABUSE OF POWER Re: Missing nonunion raises (No subject)

TJ

Tom Jeleniewski <tom200is@juno.com>

|

selectmen.caplis@templeton1.org;

sewsup@yahoo.com;

m129@comcast.net;

rdennis5870@comcast.net;

...

John, et al:

Why has this issue not been addressed? You and the rest of the board have expectations from the Sewer Department, yet you have callously chosen to IGNORE the town meeting vote which granted a 2% raise to non-union employees. You and your TA are engaging in ABUSE of POWER which will not be tolerated. So much for transparency and cooperation.

The Sewer Department also has sent you a request to consult with Town Counsel concerning other matters, which so far has also been ignored.

I intend to raise these issues to the general public via whatever means necessary.

So please give careful consideration to your unhealthy and devious tactics.

 

As a taxpayer and member of the Board of Sewer Commission I expect a response the this communication.

 

Regards,

Tom Jeleniewski

---------- Original Message ----------
From: Selectman Caplis <selectmen.caplis@templeton1.org>
To: Tom Jeleniewski <tom200is@juno.com>
Cc: sewsup@yahoo.com, m129@comcast.net, rdennis5870@comcast.net,        seldhaleybrooks@templeton1.org, seldmorrison@templeton1.org,        seljrichard@templeton1.org, selectmen.fortes@templeton1.org,        templetonwwtp@verizon.net, townadministrator@templeton1.org
Subject: Re: Missing nonunion raises
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 13:34:10 -0400

 

Good day everyone,

 

BoS members please do not respond information only!

 

 Based on the first email that I received concerning this was the first time I am hearing about this.  So I am sure this is an oversight and this will be corrected based on Annual Town Meeting and the Warrant Article. Please give the Board an opportunity to see what is going on.  I understand how this would make you upset after everything else that was happening but like I said give the Board an opportunity to identify the issue. 

 

Thank you

 

Respectfully 

John 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 13, 2018, at 3:28 PM, Tom Jeleniewski <tom200is@juno.com> wrote:

 

Kent,

 

UNNACEPTABLE.  This is either another case of harassment of the sewer department or a case of incompetence at town hall or both. I will place a wager that we here nothing from anyone on the distribution list regarding this.

I am growing extremely weary of constantly battling the corner office. I suggest that if this issue is not resolved IMMEDIATELY, we contact legal council and/or file a complaint with the state regarding this. I will be in your office on Monday morning to set a course of action. I will also forward to the Advisory committee.

Regards,

Tom Jeleniewski

---------- Original Message ----------
From: Kent Songer <sewsup@yahoo.com>
To: Mark <m129@comcast.net>, Tom Jeleniewski <tom200is@juno.com>,  Bobby <rdennis5870@comcast.net>,  Selectmen John Caplis <selectmen.caplis@templeton1.org>,  Selectwoman Diane Haley Brooks <seldhaleybrooks@templeton1.org>,  Selectmen Doug Morrison <seldmorrison@templeton1.org>,  Selectwoman Julie Richard <seljrichard@templeton1.org>,  "Cameron R. Fortes" <selectmen.fortes@templeton1.org>
Cc: Carol Osborne <templetonwwtp@verizon.net>,  Townadministrator <townadministrator@templeton1.org>
Subject: Missing nonunion raises
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 12:24:37 +0000 (UTC)

 

I write to make you aware that Sewer Department nonunion employees did not receive the 2% raises that were approved by the Board of Sewer Commission, and appropriated by town voters at this year’s annual town meeting.  I sent Kelli an email late in the business day yesterday informing her of this, and have not heard back yet.

Notice was given to accounting to implement these raises along with the union raises.  Union personnel received their raises. 

Given the past and ongoing refusal of the Town Administrator to implement the Sewer Department Administrative Assistant’s approved pay increase, this causes me great concern.

My hope and expectation is that this will be resolved retroactively in the next pay period.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

 

Regards,

Kent Songer

Documentation shows back in October of 2017, selectmen received from the Collins institute a document with it's opinion concerning Templeton by-laws specifically on the Advisory Committee.
It was on the subject line of Roles and responsibilities of Advisory Committee.

Selectmen went on to propose multiple changes to Town by-laws regarding the Advisory Committee, without having any discussion with the committee, including withholding this document from the Collins institute.

One interesting item included was the institute stating they were aware of only one other town where Advisory Committee can appoint it's own members if a vacancy occurs during the year. A search with a timeline of about 5 minutes showed this to be not true and there are probably other towns where this is done as well. Great to see transparency and this so called working together thing often coming from the selectmen.

So, the audits are coming, the audits are coming;

The audits are complete and now we have good numbers?

Now we have a good financial team in place?

Town Hall employees state that time could be better spent than answering resident questions on town finance and it is discouraging to have so many questions on town spending and on town financial records.

Town Administrator states a known incorrect number was written in on a document being used to obtain funding for a new sewer department pump station.

Questions being raised again on whether a town employee broke a contract or request for services into several parts, thus avoiding or breaking a Massachusetts General Law (c 30B) for which the town has already been shown to have done and had training from the MA inspector general's office.

As all of this is considered, the question (in my opinion) becomes has Templeton really made any progress or has it been one grand illusion?

On another front, a report out from MIT that devices, particularly cel phones and all those "apps" really do appear to be tracking and recording what we do on those phones.

Things like putting photos on the so called cloud, even if the photos are deleted from the phone and whether you are asked permission or not; those same apps even record key strokes and send this data out to whom ever is / will pay for it. Seems like the so called big brother is really watching and keeping track of all that we do. Does not seem like the people who report such things are really wacked out after all; they just may be ahead of the curve.

TO: Board of Selectmen
FROM: Carter Terenzini, Town Administrator
RE: Administrator’s Weekly Report
DATE: August 23, 2018
CC: All Departments

Important Notice to All Departments
Job Openings: Director of Public Works
                               DPW – Truck Driver (CDL)
                              Seasonal Laborer (10 week)
Business Meeting or Workshop: The following is intended to supplement agenda items where a
full memorandum may not have been required or updates are needed.

 

 

 

Weekly Report: We finalized the 08/29 interview teams and scheduling with four prospective Management Fellows. One did drop out a bit earlier today, but I am still very pleased with the pool. We have received one inquiry on the Roofing specifications, so we will get the addenda posted by Monday with bids remaining on target. This will provide an opportunity to seek supplemental funding for this and the Senior Center siding – if needed – at the Fall TM. I have advised the Capital Committee we may need to submit projects for review, so we can try to have any such needed report by the time we ask you to vote on the final warrant. I have begun drafting a repair of private ways bylaw, special legislation and adoption of the statute allowing for deferral of payments by certain elderly. As you may know we need to get pricing on the engineering study needed for Stoney Bridge Road. I’ve spoken with John Henshaw who informs me the CPC may be able to provide some funding for someone to write the RFP using the state model. I’ve reached out to two engineering firms to see if they can do this for us on a very quick turnaround. Much of our time (4+ staff hours) was spent on addressing questions raised about our several financial reports which I have also provided to you. I do have to say that at some point we will no longer be able to continue to provide these kinds of detailed responses unless coming by means of a formal committee vote or a public records request. We are seeking proposals on survey and title work for Baldwinville Elementary School and agreed with Mr. Henshaw these are 100% eligible under our CPC appropriation. We had the kick-off of our CDBG planning. Mike P. should have a follow-up memo out to all within two weeks. Our several interns. work study students ended their service with us. While the program is in some jeopardy due to scheduling changes at the High School we have reached out to the Superintendent to see what can be done to preserve it

Administration & Finance
Town Accountant: This week has been very discouraging as I have worked with Carter on a number of email concerns about the financial reporting. We have addressed every concern with explanation, but none the less very time consuming and as I said before discouraging. I completed the final quarterly report and presented it to selectman on Wednesday. Today we interviewed for finance clerk in the Treasurer/Collector office and found a great candidate for the job


This report can be seen in its entirety on the town website under departments / town administrator.



When a resident has a problem involving a Town owned drain pipe, they contact the highway department. When the highway department people show up, see a hole in the hot top drive way (driveway apron?) and they also see an old drain pipe that is obviously old and rusted/rotted, because there is a hole in it as well; their solution is to put some road grindings in it and call it a day.

The next thing that person does is attend a selectmen meeting and inform them of the issue and the so called fix from the Templeton highway department. The other issue here is that the people from the highway department left without any verbal follow up, such as the pipe needs to be replaced and we have to order one, or we will be back on such a day/date and time to take care of this.

Selectmen take some information from the resident and inform the resident that someone will be contacting you from the highway department / DPW. Now, if you are a selectmen, someone from the highway department will come right over and help you tear up your driveway apron, (apparently) according to multiple town residents.

Perhaps residents of Laurel View Road are better off having a contractor do repairs on that road.

On another front, town finance, an issue with the balance of the Templeton general stabilization fund was brought up and question by a town resident; Town administrator sent out an email showing that the balance of that account was known to be in error last August, 2017. Almost a year later, that wrong amount is written in on a document used to borrow money for the town. How does that work, using a dollar figure, that you have known for about a year, to be in error, but you still put that incorrect dollar figure on the paper work??

Do not worry, the audits are complete, we have good numbers, a great financial team in place and some very good things are happening in Templeton.

And remember, the town administrator did not say anything about a tax override concerning stoney bridge work. Lastly, is it a good thing for a town employee to complain about having to spend too much time on answering questions and providing information to a town resident; I thought these selectmen were all about transparency, so which is it?

So, last nights selectmen meeting;

Town Administrator states he did not say anything about a possible tax override to cover costs concerning stoney bridge, perhaps he should pursue a retraction from the paper, as that was contained in the article published.

The codification process apparently will not be presented until next spring, according to the town administrator (that is recorded).

Selectmen Brooks made a motion to try to compel an employee (sewer department superintendent Kent Songer) to attend a selectmen meeting, which would be after work hours. She also made a point of the sewer commissioners meetings be held at town hall so they can be recorded. Now that would be nice, so I would like to know when selectmen Brooks will make a motion to compel the general manager of the light & water department to attend a selectmen meeting, as well as have light & water meetings at town hall so they can be recorded/broadcasted as well?

On Laurel View Road, another reason I can bring up for the Town to continue to plow it is public safety, as in the fire department being able to have access to those homes. PUBLIC SAFETY, as in the Town Ambulance being able to travel on that road, which so far, has been plowed by the town, as well as minor repairs done to the road. Public safety, as in the police being able to travel that road.

Lastly, the town administrator stated that time spent answering citizens request for information could be better spent on other things. Is that great or what, a public employee complaining on having to answer questions from citizens, the ones who provide the money to pay their salary and then ask questions concerning the spending of that money, feels it is a problem having to take time to answer questions from those same citizens. Where does selectmen Brooks stand on that issue?

Oh yeah, where are the town employee salaries in the annual town report?