Templeton Board of
Selectmen
c/o Carter Terenzini
Town Administrator
160 Patriots Road,
P.O. Box 620
East Templeton, MA
01438
By e-mail only:
cterenzini@templetonma.gov
RE: Open Meeting Law
Complaint
Dear Mr. Terenzini:
This office received a
complaint from Robert May on July 1, 2020, alleging that the
Templeton Board of
Selectmen (the “Board”) violated the Open Meeting Law, G.L. c. 30A, §§
18-25, as modified by
Governor Charles Baker’s March 12 order temporarily suspending certain
provisions of the Open Meeting Law. 1 The complaint was originally filed with
the Board on June 1, and you responded, on behalf of the Board, by letter dated
June 24. 2020 The complaint alleges that the Board violated the Open Meeting
Law when it held a meeting on May 27 and did not provide the public with
real-time access.
Following our review,
we find that the Board violated the Open Meeting Law as alleged.
In reaching this
determination, we reviewed the original complaint, the Board’s response to the
complaint, and the
request for further review filed with our office. In addition, we reviewed the
notice and open
session minutes of the May 27 meeting, as well as a video recording of that
meeting.
1 All dates in this
letter refer to the year 2020.
2 We take this
opportunity to remind the Board that the Open Meeting Law requires that within
14 business days of receipt of a complaint, a public body must meet to review
the complaint’s allegations; take remedial action, if appropriate; send to the
complainant a response and a description of any remedial action taken; and send
to the Attorney General a copy of the complaint and a description of a any
remedial action taken. G.L. c. 30A, § 23(b); 940 CMR 29.05(5).
See OML Declination
8-7-2019 (Pepperell Board of Selectmen). Here, the Board did not respond to the
complaint until June 24, although its response was due June 19. We remind the
Board of its obligations under the Law.
(working on posting the complaint / response in its entirety)
Chairmans SNAFU seemingly leading town down the same old path..............Maybe we need a Civilian Command that understands Accountability? Maybe we need a Chairman that understands who works for whom?
ReplyDeleteThere is structure when people are on a Committee and are involved in town related business. The Open Meeting Law is in place for a reason. No Committee member can do their own thing. The term "Open Meeting" is there for a reason. The sooner department and Committee members under stand that, the better off we all will be.
ReplyDelete