Saturday, June 24, 2017

Selectmen finally ad "public comment" item to agenda, per their own policies and procedures. To bad it was done to an agenda that was posted finally at 10:23 P.M. Thursday evening, past the 48 minimum requirement per the Open Meeting Law. The public comment item was added on Friday Morning at 11:36 A.M. So here is a pat on the back selectmen for a job well done . . .sort of!


from the AG's Open Meeting Law guide:

Meeting notices must be posted in a legible, easily understandable format; contain the date, time, and place of the meeting; and list all topics that the chair reasonably anticipates, 48 hours in advance, will be discussed at the meeting.  The list of topics must be sufficiently specific to reasonably inform the public of the issues to be discussed at the meeting.  Where there are no anticipated topics for discussion in open session other than the procedural requirements for convening an executive session, the public body should list “open session” as a topic, in addition to the executive session, so the public is aware that it has the opportunity to attend and learn the basis for the executive session. 


The finally posted agenda has items 1, 2, 3, 4a thru 4q, then 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 adjourn. The Town Administrator weekly report posted earlier in the day has references to those 4a - 4q items, indicating some knowledge of what was going to be included at the next open meeting of selectmen on June 26, 2017. So, why was the meeting not posted until Thursday evening past the 48 hour rule? Is this another case of selectmen snubbing rules, procedures and the law? Is this an open meeting law violation. Could that be a $1,000.00 fine? We shall see.


posted by Jeff Bennett

4 comments:

  1. Looks like this week could be a little stressful for some on the Administration. I wonder if we'll see another "emergency addition" to the agenda, hmmmmm.

    Stay tuned, Beeeeeeep, if this had been an actual emergency............

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was wrong. It's an Emergency delay. Political? Not a Emergency anymore?

      Delete
  2. How very interesting.

    This is the posted agenda for Monday's BoF meeting:

    Agenda
    1.Call the Meeting to Order
    2. Pledge of Allegiance
    3. Meeting Minutes~ 6.12.17
    4. New Business:
    a. Introduction of New Employee
    b. Discussion Re: 06/28 w/DOR (portions w/Advisory Committee)
    c. Action RE: Representative to MPO
    d. Action RE: Annual Appointments
    e. Action RE: Otter River Sportsman’s One-Day Licenses
    f. Action RE: Open Space Plan Submission to the State
    g. Action RE: Open Space Grant Re: Land Acquisition at TDC
    h. Action RE: BoS member to attend Advisory Committee Meetings
    i. Action RE: FY ’17 Budget Transfer Request(s)
    j. Action RE: Response to OML Complaint of J. Farrell
    k. Action RE: Response to OML Complaint of R. May
    l. Action RE: Filing of OML Complaint #1 w/Advisory Committee
    m. Action RE: Filing of OML Complaint #2 w/Advisory Committee
    n. Action RE: Memo of TA Re: Options to Fill Position
    o. Update RE: Town Website Renewal Project
    p. Update RE: Scholarship Committee
    q. Update RE: Audit Workpaper Review/Approval

    5. Old Business:
    6. Public Comment
    7. Board & Staff Member Comments & Reports
    8. Potential Request for Executive Session
    9. Adjournment
    The listing of Agenda items is those reasonably anticipated by the Chair which may be discussed at the meeting. Not all items listed may in fact be discussed and other items not listed may also be brought up for discussion to the extent it is permitted by law.
    THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE

    So IF this meeting has been posted improperly - not within the 48 hour timeframe per the Open Meeting Law- maybe these select people might want to consider tabling the filing of 2 open meeting law violations against the Advisory Committee?

    At least until they can figure out how to post a meeting correctly within the 48 hour timeframe.

    'Cause wouldn't THAT be ironic?

    Discussing filing an OML violation against another board at a meeting that has not been posted correctly ?

    Priceless.

    My opinions as always!

    Julie Farrell

    ReplyDelete