The Montachusett Veterans Outreach Center has launched a new website, making it easier for veterans to access services, according to a community announcement.

The Barre Savings Charitable Foundation provided funding for the website, which was developed by Gardner-based InConcert Web Solutions. The site is now fully compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act and accessible via computer, tablet and phone. It also features an active veterans event calendar, downloadable housing applications and easily navigable service pages.

The MVOC has served homeless and high-risk veterans throughout North Central Massachusetts for over 40 years. Its previous website had remained unchanged for over a decade due to funding restrictions and capacity restraints.

 The State Ethics Commission has issued a formal advisory opinion that explains how the state’s conflict-of-interest law (Ch. 268A) applies to municipal employees who solicit donations or engage in fundraising on behalf of the municipality where the persons and entities approached for a donation may have business dealings with the municipality or its agencies or employees.

In general, sections 3 and 23(b)(2) of Chapter 268A prohibit public employees from soliciting anything of substantial value from anyone with whom the public employee has official business dealings.

As discussed in the advisory opinion (EC-COI-12), however, a municipal employee may solicit donations to a municipal entity from persons and entities with whom he, or other municipal employees, has or expects to have official dealings, consistent with Chapter 268A, provided that all of the following are true:

1. The solicitation is carried out in accordance with Chapter 44, Section 53A, which authorizes acceptance of gifts by municipal employees on behalf of the municipality, and, by implication, authorizes the solicitation of gifts.

2. The solicitation is not made in circumstances that are inherently coercive because the person or entity solicited may be directly and significantly affected by a pending or anticipated decision of the same municipality.

3. No overt pressure is exerted in connection with any such solicitation.

4. The municipality and its employees apply objective standards in all dealings with persons and entities who are solicited and do not favor those who give or disfavor those who do not.

5. The municipal employee principally responsible for making such solicitations discloses publicly and in writing the names of those solicited, pursuant to Chapter 268A, Section 23(b)(3).

 Article 27.   To see if the Town will vote to accept the provisions of M.G.L. C.59, §5K, Senior Tax Work-Off Program, for taxpayers over 60 years of age.  The program shall be implemented in fiscal year 2013, with abatements applied to the fiscal year 2014 actual tax bills provided, however, that such program shall provide a maximum abatement of $500.00 for each of up to twenty participants with an hourly rate of $8.00; said abatement(s) of up to a total of $10,000.00 to be paid from the Excess Overlay Reserve account; or to take any other action relative thereto.                                                 

Submitted by Susan Byrne, MAA, Deputy Assessor and Eileen Clarkson, HS-BCP, MS, Notary Public, director of Council on Aging/Senior Center/Food Pantry/Meals on Wheels/Transportation 

On an amended motion duly made and seconded the town voted to accept the provisions of M.G.L. C.59, §5K, Senior Tax Work-Off Program, for taxpayers over 60 years of age. The program shall be implemented in fiscal year 2013, with abatements applied to the fiscal year 2014 actual tax bills, provided however, that such program shall provide a maximum abatement of Five-Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for each participant earned at an hourly rate of Eight Dollars ($8.00); said abatement(s) to be paid from the Assessor’s Overlay account. Passed Unanimously/May 16th @ 8:50 

MGL c59 section 5K: A city or town, by vote of its legislative body, subject to its charter, may adjust the exemption in this clause by: (1) allowing an approved representative, for persons physically unable, to provide such services to the city or town; or (2) allowing the maximum reduction of the real property tax bill to be based on 125 volunteer service hours in a given tax year, rather than $2,000.

MGL c59, section 5K: In any city or town which accepts the provisions of this section, the board of selectmen of a town or in a municipality having a town council form of government, the town council or the mayor with the approval of the city council in a city may establish a program to allow persons over the age of 60 to volunteer to provide services to such city or town. In exchange for such volunteer services, the city or town shall reduce the real property tax obligations of such person over the age of 60 on his tax bills and any reduction so provided shall be in addition to any exemption or abatement to which any such person is otherwise entitled and no such person shall receive a rate of, or be credited with, more than the current minimum wage of the commonwealth per hour for services provided pursuant to such reduction nor shall the reduction of the real property tax bill exceed $2,000 in a given tax year. It shall be the responsibility of the city or town to maintain a record for each taxpayer including, but not limited to, the number of hours of service and the total amount by which the real property tax has been reduced and to provide a copy of such record to the assessor in order that the actual tax bill reflect the reduced rate. A copy of such record shall also be provided to the taxpayer prior to the issuance of the actual tax bill. Such cities and towns shall have the power to create local rules and procedures for implementing this section in any way consistent with the intent of this section.

 The Joint Committee on Transportation yesterday released a bond bill that would authorize $300 million for the Chapter 90 local road and bridge program for fiscal 2026, a 50% increase over previous years.

The bill (H. 4257) would distribute $200 million based on the traditional Chapter 90 formula and $100 million based on road miles only.

The committee’s proposal is a one-year authorization, whereas the governor had previously proposed $300 million per year for five years.

The committee’s nearly $1.2 billion borrowing bill would also authorize $200 million for a culvert and small bridge program overseen by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, along with $500 million for a MassDOT bridge and pavement asset management program and $185 million for congestion and safety initiatives.

 There is still one opening on Templeton advisory committee. If appointed, term would be until adjournment of Templeton annual town meeting May 2026.

 Good Morning

Over the weekend we had some more damage to the roof at Houghton Park.

The Police have 3 suspects who admitted to doing the damage.

We will be getting an estimate to repair damage to the roof and those 3 suspects will be responsible for paying for the damage.

They will more than likely be serving some community service hours as well.

Good Afternoon

The construction for the School St. project is completed.

School St. is officially open to 2-way traffic.

 Templeton, MA June meals tax revenue reports as $19,670.00.

Meals Tax revenue for fiscal year 25 is down $523.00 from previous year, using data from MA division local service.

FY24 total meals tax $83,879.00

FY25 total meals tax $83,356.00

Fiscal Year 25 meals tax for 1st., 3rd and 4th quarters were down from previous FY. 2nd qtr. was up from previous FY.

Templeton Meals Tax history.

Fiscal Year

2019 total $41,709.00

2020 total $50,573.00

2021 total $55,457.00

2022 total $67.168.00

2023 total $77,346.00

2024 total $83,879.00

2025 total $83,356.00

 Fiscally responsible spending plan is more than $1 billion below H1; Will make Massachusetts more affordable, improve transportation, invest in the state's world-class education system, and grow economy. House 1 is the state budget generally put forward in January that most cities and towns use as basis for state aid in local budgets. Except now the state has reduced it by 1 billion dollars. This is exactly why town should not use stabilization funds to pay reoccurring expenses such as school assessment. It was a dumb move a couple years ago, was a dumb move this year and will always be a dumb move, fiscally speaking.